ArticleThe Analyst2019
Microfluidic MeDIP-seq for low-input methylomic analysis of mammary tumorigenesis in mice.
Article in The Analyst, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide profiling of unmodified DNA using methyltransferase-directed tagging and enrichment.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Cell-Free DNA Bisulfite Sequencing Reveals Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Signatures for Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Single-Cell DNA Methylation Analysis in Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- Microfluidic Platform for Next-Generation Sequencing Library Preparation with Low-Input Samples.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Perspectives on the Role of Histone Modification in Breast Cancer Progression and the Advanced Technological Tools to Study Epigenetic Determinants of Metastasis.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- Microfluidic epigenomic mapping technologies for precision medicine.Lab on a chip · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies of dynamic epigenomic changes during tumorigenesis using mice often require profiling epigenomes using a tiny quantity of tissue samples. Conventional epigenomic tests do not support such analysis due to the large amount of materials required by these assays. In this study, we developed an ultrasensitive microfluidics-based methylated DNA immunoprecipitation followed by next-generation sequencing (MeDIP-seq) technology for profiling methylomes using as little as 0.5 ng DNA (or ∼100 cells) with 1.5 h on-chip process for immunoprecipitation. This technology enabled us to examine genome-wide DNA methylation in a C3(1)/SV40 T-antigen transgenic mouse model during different stages of mammary cancer development. Using our data, we identified differentially methylated regions and their associated genes in different periods of cancer development. Our results showed that unique methylomic features were presented in various tumor developmental stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.