ArticleCanadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2018
The Natural History of Incidental Colonic Diverticulosis on Screening Colonoscopy.
Article in Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progression rate of diverticular disease and associated risk factors: results from 5-year longitudinal prospective nationwide diverticular disease registry (REMAD).Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing colonoscopy in Gaza Strip hospitals: a retrospective study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Colonic diverticular hemorrhage: Etiology, diagnostic challenges, and evolving therapeutic strategies.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Hinchey Stage IV Diverticulitis in a Kratom User.Cureus · 2025Article
- Contemporary management of diverticulitis.Surgery open science · 2024Article
- Colonic Ganglioneuroma: A Combined Single-Institution Experience and Review of the Literature of Forty-Three Patients.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- When to Perform a Colonoscopy in Diverticular Disease and Why: A Personalized Approach.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Association between serum uric acid levels and colonic diverticulosis in terms of sex.PloS one · 2022Article
- Right sided diverticulitis in western countries: A review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Article
- The Epidemiology and Etiology of Right-Sided Colonic Diverticulosis: A Review.Annals of coloproctology · 2021Review
- Drains, Germs, or Steel: Multidisciplinary Management of Acute Colonic Diverticulitis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2020Review
- Diverticular Disease in the Elderly.Current gastroenterology reports · 2019Review
- The Natural History of Colonic Diverticulosis: Much Ado about Nothing?Inflammatory intestinal diseases · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The natural history of colonic diverticulosis is unclear. Methods: Patients with incidental diverticulosis identified in a previous prospective cross-sectional screening colonoscopy study were evaluated retrospectively for clinic or hospital visit(s) for diverticular disease (DD= acute diverticulitis or diverticular bleeding) using review of electronic health records and patient phone interview. Results: 826 patients were included in the screening colonoscopy study. Three were excluded for prior DD. In all, 224 patients (27.2%; mean age 62.3 ± 8.2) had incidental diverticulosis distributed in the left colon (67.4%), right colon (5.8%), or both (22.8%). Up-to-date information was available on 194 patients. Of those, 144 (74.2%) could be reached for detailed interview and constituted the study population. Over a mean follow-up of 7.0 ± 1.7 years, DD developed in 6 out of 144 patients (4.2%) (4 acute cases of diverticulitis, 1 probable case of diverticular bleeding, and 1 acute case of diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding). Two patients were hospitalized, and none required surgery. The time to event was 5.1 ± 1.6 years and the incidence rate was 5.9 per 1000 patient-years. On multivariate analysis, none of the variables collected at baseline colonoscopy including age, gender, obesity, exercise, fiber intake, alcohol use, constipation, or use of NSAIDs were associated with DD. Conclusion: The natural history of incidental diverticulosis on screening colonoscopy was highly favorable in this well-defined prospectively identified cohort. The common scenario of incidental diverticulosis at screening colonoscopy makes this information clinically relevant and valuable to physicians and patients alike.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.