Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30631713›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of STEM education2018

The influence of active learning practices on student anxiety in large-enrollment college science classrooms.

Katelyn M Cooper, Virginia R Downing, Sara E Brownell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of STEM education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effect of a liquid syllabus on student engagement and sense of belonging.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Self-regulated learning in STEM: non-academics matter.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katelyn M Cooper *Biology Education Research Lab, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, PO Box 874501, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501 USA.
Virginia R Downing *Biology Education Research Lab, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, PO Box 874501, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501 USA.
Sara E BrownellBiology Education Research Lab, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, PO Box 874501, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past decade, the prevalence of anxiety has increased among college-aged students and college counseling centers have become increasingly concerned about the negative impact of anxiety on students. While college in general can be stressful, college science classrooms have the potential to be especially anxiety-inducing because of the sometimes chilly and competitive environment of the class. Further, college science courses are increasingly being transitioned from traditional lecture to active learning where students take an active role in their learning, often through participating in activities such as clicker questions and group work. There is emerging evidence that suggests active learning activities may cause students to feel anxious, but no studies have thoroughly explored why active learning activities in science courses may increase students' anxiety. Further, no studies have explored whether active learning activities can reduce students' anxiety. In this exploratory interview study of 52 students enrolled in large-enrollment active learning college science courses, we investigate how three active learning practices, clicker questions, group work, and cold call/random call, increase and decrease students' anxiety.

resultsStudents reported that clicker questions and group work had the potential to both increase and decrease their anxiety. The way the active learning activity is implemented and the extent to which students perceive they benefit from the activity seems to influence the effect of the activity on students' anxiety. Conversely, students reported that cold call and random call only increased their anxiety. From our interviews, we identified the fear of negative evaluation, or the sense of dread associated with being unfavorably evaluated while participating in a social situation, as the primary construct underlying students' high levels of anxiety associated with speaking out in front of the whole class when they do not volunteer.

conclusionThis study illustrates that active learning can both increase and decrease students' anxiety depending on the way active learning is implemented. We hope that this study encourages instructors to create more inclusive active learning science courses by implementing active learning in ways that minimize students' anxiety.

Indexed as

Active learningAnxietyAnxiousnessClickersCold callCollege classroomEvaluationFear of negative evaluationGroup workMental healthRandom callScience classroomStressUndergraduates

Identifiers

PMID30631713
PMCPMC6310416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.