Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30631389›Full record

ArticleBayesian analysis2019

Joining and splitting models with Markov melding.

Robert J B Goudie, Anne M Presanis, David Lunn, Daniela De Angelis, Lorenz Wernisch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bayesian analysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Interoperability of statistical models in pandemic preparedness: principles and reality.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Evidence Synthesis for Stochastic Epidemic Models.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert J B GoudieMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Anne M PresanisMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
David LunnMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Daniela De AngelisMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Lorenz WernischMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105260799Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/11Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysing multiple evidence sources is often feasible only via a modular approach, with separate submodels specified for smaller components of the available evidence. Here we introduce a generic framework that enables fully Bayesian analysis in this setting. We propose a generic method for forming a suitable joint model when

Indexed as

Bayesian meldingevidence synthesisMarkov combinationmodel integration

Identifiers

PMID30631389
PMCPMC6324725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.