Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30631348›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology research and practice2018

Intraoperative Blood Loss during Induced Abortion: A Comparison of Anesthetics.

Camille A Clare, Gabrielle E Hatton, Neela Shrestha, Michael Girshin, Andre Broumas, Danielle Carmel, Mario A Inchiosa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology research and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camille A ClareDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8784-5118
Gabrielle E HattonDepartment of Surgery, The University of Texas at Houston/UTHealth, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1798-7369
Neela ShresthaDepartment of Anesthesiology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Michael GirshinDepartment of Anesthesiology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Andre BroumasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Danielle CarmelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3173-2955
Mario A InchiosaDepartment of Anesthesiology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5933-5222
New York Medical College · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

ROLE OF THE GUT IN POST INJURY MULTIPLE ORGAN FAILURET32GM008792 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Charles S Cox · 2001 to 2026
$5.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether there is a difference in intraoperative bleeding with inhalational versus noninhalational anesthetic agents for patients undergoing suction dilatation and curettage for first-trimester induced abortion.

methodsThis is an IRB-approved retrospective chart review of the electronic medical records of patients undergoing induced abortion at gestational ages between 5 0/7 and 14 0/7 weeks of pregnancy at the New York City Health + Hospitals/Metropolitan. The records of 138 patients who underwent suction dilatation and curettage for induced abortion between June 2012 and June 2014 were reviewed for an association between anesthetic technique and intraoperative hemorrhage. Twenty patients received inhalational anesthetic agents, while 118 received intravenous anesthetics. Blood loss was estimated by the operating gynecologists.

resultsThe mean intraoperative blood loss for inhalational anesthetics (113.6 ml) was significantly higher than with noninhalational agents (40.2 ml) (

conclusionsThe difference in blood loss between the two types of anesthetic techniques was statistically significant. These findings may be important for patients with significant anemia or at an increased risk of bleeding, such as those with unrecognized coagulopathies.

Identifiers

PMID30631348
PMCPMC6305036
OpenAlexW2903115533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.