Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30631311›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Weak Iron Oxidation by

Stephan Christel, Malte Herold, Sören Bellenberg, Antoine Buetti-Dinh, Mohamed El Hajjami, Igor V Pivkin, Wolfgang Sand, Paul Wilmes, Ansgar Poetsch, Mario Vera and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Draft Genome Sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stephan ChristelCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Malte HeroldLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Sören BellenbergCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Antoine Buetti-DinhFaculty of Informatics, Institute of Computational Science, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
Mohamed El HajjamiPlant Biochemistry, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Igor V PivkinFaculty of Informatics, Institute of Computational Science, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
Wolfgang SandAquatic Biotechnology, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Paul WilmesLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Ansgar PoetschPlant Biochemistry, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Mario VeraSchools of Engineering, Medicine and Biological Sciences, Institute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Mark DopsonCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioleaching is an emerging technology, describing the microbially assisted dissolution of sulfidic ores that provides a more environmentally friendly alternative to many traditional metal extraction methods, such as roasting or smelting. Industrial interest is steadily increasing and today, circa 15-20% of the world's copper production can be traced back to this method. However, bioleaching of the world's most abundant copper mineral chalcopyrite suffers from low dissolution rates, often attributed to passivating layers, which need to be overcome to use this technology to its full potential. To prevent these passivating layers from forming, leaching needs to occur at a low oxidation/reduction potential (ORP), but chemical redox control in bioleaching heaps is difficult and costly. As an alternative, selected weak iron-oxidizers could be employed that are incapable of scavenging exceedingly low concentrations of iron and therefore, raise the ORP just above the onset of bioleaching, but not high enough to allow for the occurrence of passivation. In this study, we report that microbial iron oxidation by

Indexed as

bioleachingchalcopyriteiron oxidationLeptospirillummicrobialredox controlSulfobacillus

Identifiers

PMID30631311
PMCPMC6315122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.