ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2018
A Similarity-Based Process for Human Judgment in the Parietal Cortex.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phase-lagged tACS between executive and default mode networks modulates working memory.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow? modeling numerical judgments of realistic stimuli.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- Directed functional connectivity of the default-mode-network of young and older healthy subjects.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Chronic pain domains and their relationship to personality, abilities, and brain networks.Pain · 2023Article
- Exemplar-based judgment or direct recall: On a problematic procedure for estimating parameters in exemplar models of quantitative judgment.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Review
- The Consumer Contextual Decision-Making Model.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Building Memory Representations for Exemplar-Based Judgment: A Role for Ventral Precuneus.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One important distinction in psychology is between inferences based on associative memory and inferences based on analysis and rules. Much previous empirical work conceive of associative and analytical processes as two exclusive ways of addressing a judgment task, where only one process is selected and engaged at a time, in an
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.