ArticleJournal of mixed methods research2019
Process Evaluation of a Retreat for Scholars in the First Cohort: The NIH Mixed Methods Research Training Program for the Health Sciences.
Article in Journal of mixed methods research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Science and Art of Mixed Methods in Medical Education Research.Family medicine · 2026Article
- Qualitative Research Leaders: Evaluation of Pilot Global Pipeline Program.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
- Going virtual: mixed methods evaluation of online versus in-person learning in the NIH mixed methods research training program retreat.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Participant Experiences of an Infant Obesity Prevention Program Delivered via Telephone Calls or Text Messages.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Mixed methods grant applications in the health sciences: An analysis of reviewer comments.PloS one · 2019Article
- Skills Development and Academic Productivity of Scholars in the NIH Mixed Methods Research Training Program for the Health Sciences.International journal of multiple research approaches · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Mixed Methods Research Training Program for the Health Sciences aims to enlarge the national pool of trained investigators in mixed methods and improve the quality of grant applications to the NIH. Selected scholars are assigned a consulting team, participate in webinars, and attend an annual "retreat" focused on learning mixed methods through application to their research. Our paper summarizes the process evaluation of the retreat. Scholars identified strengths in small interactive groups to discuss individual projects and the opportunity to apply learning. Scholars wanted further opportunity to discuss individual projects, understanding interventions and mixed methods, and finding collaborators. Our findings will be useful to leaders developing workshops or similar programs at the faculty level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.