Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30631145›Full record

ArticleHeredity2019

Genomic selection of juvenile height across a single-generational gap in Douglas-fir.

Frances R Thistlethwaite, Blaise Ratcliffe, Jaroslav Klápště, Ilga Porth, Charles Chen, Michael U Stoehr, Yousry A El-Kassaby

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Toward genomic selection inApplications in plant sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Frances R ThistlethwaiteDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, The University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Blaise RatcliffeDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, The University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4469-2929
Jaroslav KlápštěDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, The University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5504-3735
Ilga PorthDépartement des sciences du bois et de la forêt, Université Laval, G1V 0A6, Québec, QC, Canada.
Charles ChenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078-3035, USA.
Michael U StoehrBritish Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, Victoria, BC, V8W 9C2, Canada.
Yousry A El-KassabyDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, The University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. y.el-kassaby@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4887-8977
University of British Columbia · CAMinistry of Forests · CAOklahoma State University · USUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we perform cross-generational GS analysis on coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), reflecting trans-generational selective breeding application. A total of 1321 trees, representing 37 full-sib F

Indexed as

British ColumbiaGenomicsLinear ModelsModels, GeneticPlant BreedingPseudotsuga

Identifiers

PMID30631145
PMCPMC6781123
OpenAlexW2908556754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.