ArticleJournal of human hypertension2019
Aortic-to-brachial artery stiffness gradient is not blood pressure independent.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aortic Stiffness and Diastolic Dysfunction in Sprague Dawley Rats Consuming Short-Term Fructose Plus High Salt Diet.Integrated blood pressure control · 2020Article
- Higher aortic-brachial pulse wave velocity ratio is associated with large artery atherosclerosis-related ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic stiffness predicts cardiovascular mortality but is limited as a risk marker because it is dependent on blood pressure (BP). A potential solution is provided from the ratio of aortic-to-brachial artery stiffness (ab-ratio), which has been shown to be a BP-independent risk marker among patients with renal dysfunction (RD). We sought to determine the BP independence of the ab-ratio in patients with disease, including RD, and healthy populations. The ab-ratio (aortic/brachial pulse wave velocity) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded in patients with RD (n = 119, aged 65 ± 7 years), hypertension (n = 140, aged 62 ± 9 years), type 2 diabetes mellitus (n = 77, aged 60 ± 9 years) and healthy subjects (n = 99, aged 51 ± 8 years). Multiple-regression analysis was performed to test the independent association of MAP with the ab-ratio adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, glucose and heart rate. There was no significant relationship between the ab-ratio and MAP in patients with RD (β = 0.08, p = 0.34), hypertension (β = 0.04, p = 0.62) or diabetes (β = 0.22, p = 0.11). However, among healthy subjects the ab-ratio was significantly and independently associated with MAP (β = 0.31, p = 0.003). There was a significant difference in the strength of association between the ab-ratio and MAP between patients with disease and healthy subjects (z > 2.2, p < 0.05 all). Although ab-ratio is purported to be a risk marker that is independent of BP, this was observed only among patient populations, and not among healthy subjects. As a result, the ab-ratio has limited potential as a screening tool for the clinical assessment of arterial stiffness in otherwise healthy individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30631127What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.