ArticleHaematologica2019
Poor performance of D-dimer in excluding venous thromboembolism among patients with lymphoma and leukemia.
Article in Haematologica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of observational studies reporting antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with solid tumors.Blood advances · 2020Pooled it
- Venous thromboembolism risk in newly diagnosed lymphoma patients: a real-world prospective observational study from Vietnam National Cancer Hospital.BMC cancer · 2025Observational
- Different diagnostic strategies using D-dimer for peripherally inserted central catheter-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2023Article
- Clinical characteristics, management, and outcome of incidental pulmonary embolism in cancer patients.Blood advances · 2020Article
- Deep Venous Thrombosis in a Patient with a Moderate Pretest Probability and a Negative D-Dimer Test: A Review of the Diagnostic Algorithms.Journal of blood medicine · 2020Review
- Normal D-dimer levels in cancer patients with radiologic evidence of pulmonary embolism.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.