Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30630777›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2019

Memory and the developing brain: From description to explanation with innovation in methods.

Noa Ofen, Lingfei Tang, Qijing Yu, Elizabeth L Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Striatal and hippocampal contributions to value-based learning in adolescence.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  3. Memory in Psychiatric Disorders: A Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Longitudinal indices of human cognition and brain structure.Journal of neuroscience research · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Adult memory for specific instances of a repeated event: a preliminary review.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noa OfenLife-Span Cognitive Neuroscience Program, Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States; Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States; Merrill Palmer Skillman Institute for Child & Family Development, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States; Neurobiology Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. Electronic address: noa.ofen@wayne.edu.
Lingfei TangLife-Span Cognitive Neuroscience Program, Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States; Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
Qijing YuLife-Span Cognitive Neuroscience Program, Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States; Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
Elizabeth L JohnsonLife-Span Cognitive Neuroscience Program, Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States.

Funding

DEVELOPMENT OF MEMORY NETWORKS IN CHILDRENR01MH107512 · NIMH · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Noa Ofen · 2016 to 2026
$5.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in human cognitive neuroscience show great promise in extending our understanding of the neural basis of memory development. We briefly review the current state of knowledge, highlighting that most work has focused on describing the neural correlates of memory in cross-sectional studies. We then delineate three examples of the application of innovative methods in addressing questions that go beyond description, towards a mechanistic understanding of memory development. First, structural brain imaging and the harmonization of measurements across laboratories may uncover ways in which the maturation of the brain constrains the development of specific aspects of memory. Second, longitudinal designs and sophisticated modeling of the data may identify age-driven changes and the factors that determine individual developmental trajectories. Third, recording memory-related activity directly from the developing brain presents an unprecedented opportunity to examine how distinct brain structures support memory in real time. Finally, the growing prevalence of data sharing offers additional means to tackle questions that demand large-scale datasets, ambitious designs, and access to rare samples. We propose that the use of such innovative methods will move our understanding of memory development from a focus on describing trends to explaining the causal factors that shape behavior.

Indexed as

BrainFemaleHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryPrefrontal CortexECoGFunctional MRIHippocampusLongitudinal designPrefrontal cortexStructural MRI

Identifiers

PMID30630777
PMCPMC6529263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.