Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30630624›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2019

A lower extremity model for muscle-driven simulation of activity using explicit finite element modeling.

Donald R Hume, Alessandro Navacchia, Paul J Rullkoetter, Kevin B Shelburne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Finite element analysis of tibial and femoral resection configurations on varus alignment in total knee arthroplasty].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Using Musculoskeletal Models to EstimateFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Donald R HumeUniversity of Denver, Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Denver, CO, United States. Electronic address: don.hume@du.edu.
Alessandro NavacchiaUniversity of Denver, Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Denver, CO, United States.
Paul J RullkoetterUniversity of Denver, Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Denver, CO, United States.
Kevin B ShelburneUniversity of Denver, Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Denver, CO, United States.

Funding

A Multi-Scale Finite Element Musculoskeletal Modeling Framework Applied to CurrenR01EB015497 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF DENVER (COLORADO SEMINARY) · PI SHELBURNE, KEVIN B · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB015497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key strength of computational modeling is that it can provide estimates of muscle, ligament, and joint loads, stresses, and strains through non-invasive means. However, simulations that can predict the forces in the muscles during activity while maintaining sufficient complexity to realistically represent the muscles and joint structures can be computationally challenging. For this reason, the current state of the art is to apply separate rigid-body dynamic and finite-element (FE) analyses in series. However, the use of two or more disconnected models often fails to capture key interactions between the joint-level and whole-body scales. Single framework MSFE models have the potential to overcome the limitations associated with disconnected models in series. The objectives of the current study were to create a multi-scale FE model of the human lower extremity that combines optimization, dynamic muscle modeling, and structural FE analysis in a single framework and to apply this framework to evaluate the mechanics of healthy knee specimens during two activities. Two subject-specific FE models (Model 1, Model 2) of the lower extremity were developed in ABAQUS/Explicit including detailed representations of the muscles. Muscle forces, knee joint loading, and articular contact were calculated for two activities using an inverse dynamics approach and static optimization. Quadriceps muscle forces peaked at the onset of chair rise (2174 N, 1962 N) and in early stance phase (510 N, 525 N), while gait saw peak forces in the hamstrings (851 N, 868 N) in midstance. Joint forces were similar in magnitude to available telemetric patient data. This study demonstrates the feasibility of detailed quasi-static, muscle-driven simulations in an FE framework.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisMechanical PhenomenaPatient-Specific ModelingBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansLower ExtremityMuscle, SkeletalFinite elementGaitKneeMuscleMusculoskeletal modelingSquatting

Identifiers

PMID30630624
PMCPMC6361714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.