Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30630552›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nutrition2019

Dietary and circulating vitamin C, vitamin E, β-carotene and risk of total cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies.

Ahmad Jayedi, Ali Rashidy-Pour, Mohammad Parohan, Mahdieh Sadat Zargar, Sakineh Shab-Bidar

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Well-Known and Novel Behavioural Risk Factors for Heart Failure.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Role of Fruit-Derived Antioxidants in Fighting Cancer: A Narrative Review.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Association between dietary antioxidant indices and hypertension among Chinese adults.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Article
  16. Vicious cycle of vitamin BJournal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmad Jayedi1Food (Salt) Safety Research Center,Semnan University of Medical Sciences,Semnan,Islamic Republic of Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4231-3147
Ali Rashidy-Pour2Laboratory of Learning and Memory,Research Center and Department of Physiology,School of Medicine,Semnan University of Medical Sciences,Semnan,Islamic Republic of Iran.
Mohammad Parohan3Department of Cellular and Molecular Nutrition,School of Nutritional Science and Dietetics,Tehran University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Islamic Republic of Iran.
Mahdieh Sadat Zargar4Nursing Care Research Center,Semnan University of Medical Sciences,Semnan,Islamic Republic of Iran.
Sakineh Shab-Bidar5Department of Community Nutrition,School of Nutritional Science and Dietetics,Tehran University of Medical Sciences,PO Box 14155/6117,Tehran,Islamic Republic of Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present review aimed to quantify the association of dietary intake and circulating concentration of major dietary antioxidants with risk of total CVD mortality.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

settingSystematic search in PubMed and Scopus, up to October 2017.ParticipantsProspective observational studies reporting risk estimates of CVD mortality across three or more categories of dietary intakes and/or circulating concentrations of vitamin C, vitamin E and β-carotene were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted.

resultsA total of fifteen prospective cohort studies and three prospective evaluations within interventional studies (320 548 participants and 16 974 cases) were analysed. The relative risks of CVD mortality for the highest v. the lowest category of antioxidant intakes were as follows: vitamin C, 0·79 (95 % CI 0·68, 0·89; I 2=46 %, n 10); vitamin E, 0·91 (95 % CI 0·79, 1·03; I 2=51 %, n 8); β-carotene, 0·89 (95 % CI 0·73, 1·05; I 2=34 %, n 4). The relative risks for circulating concentrations were: vitamin C, 0·60 (95 % CI 0·42, 0·78; I 2=65 %, n 6); α-tocopherol, 0·82 (95 % CI 0·76, 0·88; I 2=0 %, n 5); β-carotene, 0·68 (95 % CI 0·52, 0·83; I 2=50 %, n 6). Dose-response meta-analyses demonstrated that the circulating biomarkers of antioxidants were more strongly associated with risk of CVD mortality than dietary intakes.

conclusionsThe present meta-analysis demonstrates that higher vitamin C intake and higher circulating concentrations of vitamin C, vitamin E and β-carotene are associated with a lower risk of CVD mortality.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntioxidantsAscorbic Acidbeta CaroteneBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesDietEatingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional StatusObservational Studies as TopicAntioxidantsAscorbic Acidbeta CaroteneBiomarkersVitamin EAntioxidantsCVDMeta-analysisObservational studies

Identifiers

PMID30630552
PMCPMC10260571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.