Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30630494›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

The safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the Maxm Skate, a lower limb rehabilitation device for use following total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Matthew G Liptak, Annika Theodoulou, Billingsley Kaambwa, Steve Saunders, Scott W Hinrichs, Richard J Woodman, Jeganath Krishnan

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Recovery After Primary Knee Surgery Rehabilitation: Patients' Perspectives on Physical Activity and Quality of Life.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew G LiptakOrthopaedics SA, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. liptakadmin@orthosa.com.au.
Annika TheodoulouThe International Musculoskeletal Research Institute Inc., Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Billingsley KaambwaHealth Economics Unit, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Steve SaundersSaunders Sports and Spinal, Adelaide, Australia.
Scott W HinrichsFlinders Private Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Richard J WoodmanFlinders Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Jeganath KrishnanThe International Musculoskeletal Research Institute Inc., Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Flinders University · AUFlinders Private Hospital · AU

Funding

South Australian Innovation Project Grant NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical rehabilitation is required to enhance functional outcomes and overall recovery following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there are no universally accepted clinical guidelines available to consistently structure rehabilitation for TKA patients. A common method is rehabilitation provided in an outpatient setting, on a one-to-one treatment basis. This method is resource-intensive and outcomes must be compared to less costly alternatives such as home-based rehabilitation. The current study will analyse a novel home-based rehabilitation program. The Maxm skate is a portable, lower-limb, postoperative, rehabilitation exercise device for individual use in a hospital or home-based setting. This study was developed to compare the safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the Maxm Skate rehabilitation program to standard rehabilitative care following TKA. The primary outcome is the range of motion (ROM) achieved by patients who received the Maxm Skate program compared to standard care at three months post TKA. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcomes, costs and functional evaluations which will be collected at multiple time-points up to 12 months after TKA.

methodsThis is a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which 116 eligible participants consented for primary TKA will be randomly allocated to receive either the Maxm Skate rehabilitation program or standard rehabilitative care. Fifty-eight participants per group will provide 90% power (α = 0.05) to detect 10° of difference in ROM between groups at three months after TKA, assuming a within-group standard deviation of 16° and allowing for 5% loss to follow-up. Participants randomised to the Maxm Skate group will use the skate device and accompanying iOS App and sensors to complete rehabilitation exercises, as outlined in the Maxm Skate Rehabilitation Guide. Outcomes will be compared to those receiving standard rehabilitative care. A blinded physiotherapist will evaluate functional outcomes preoperatively and at 2, 4, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after TKA. The functional assessment will include measures of knee ROM, pain, isometric knee strength, balance and knee/thigh circumference. Limited measures will also be assessed at day 2 postoperatively by an alternate, unblinded physiotherapist. Clinical outcome measures will be administered preoperatively and at 6, 12 and 52 weeks postoperatively. An economic evaluation will be conducted and participants will be screened for adverse event occurrences from the time of consent to 12 months postoperatively. DISCUSSION: This RCT will be the first to investigate the safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the home-based Maxm Skate Rehabilitation program, in comparison to standard rehabilitative care following primary TKA.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12616001081404p . Registered on 11 August 2016.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBiomechanical PhenomenaCost-Benefit AnalysisEquipment DesignExercise TherapyHome Care ServicesHumansKnee JointPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionSingle-Blind MethodSouth AustraliaTime FactorsCost-effectivenessHome-basedRange of motionRehabilitationTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID30630494
PMCPMC6329189
OpenAlexW2909700930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.