Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30630465›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2019

Locking nail versus locking plate for proximal humeral fracture fixation in an elderly population: a prospective randomised controlled trial.

Johannes E Plath, Christian Kerschbaum, Tobias Seebauer, Rainer Holz, Daniel J H Henderson, Stefan Förch, Edgar Mayr

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The fragility and reverse fragility indices of proximal humerus fracture randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. Treatment with an intramedullary nail.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Intramedullary nailing versus cemented plate for treating metastatic pathological fracture of the proximal humerus: a comparison study and literature review.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Johannes E PlathDepartment of Trauma, Orthopaedic, Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany. johannes.plath@gmail.com.
Christian KerschbaumDepartment of Trauma, Orthopaedic, Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Tobias SeebauerDepartment of Trauma, Orthopaedic, Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Rainer HolzDepartment of Trauma, Orthopaedic, Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Daniel J H HendersonDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Stefan FörchDepartment of Trauma, Orthopaedic, Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Edgar MayrDepartment of Trauma, Orthopaedic, Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
University Hospital Augsburg · DELeeds General Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are the third most common fracture in older patients. The purpose of the study was to prospectively evaluate the outcomes of PHF fixation with a locking blade nail (LBN) or locking plate (PHILOS) osteosynthesis in a homogeneous elderly patient population.

methodsInclusion criteria were an age > 60 years and the capacity to give informed consent. Patients with isolated tuberosity fractures, previous trauma or surgery, advanced osteoarthritis, fracture dislocation, pathological fractures, open fractures, neurological disorders, full-thickness rotator cuff tears, fracture line at the nail entry point or severely reduced bone quality intra-operatively were excluded. Eighty one patients with PHFs were randomised to treatment using LBN or PHILOS. Outcome measures comprised Constant score, age and gender adjusted Constant score, DASH score, VAS for pain, subjective overall condition of the shoulder (1-6) and active shoulder range-of-motion in flexion and abduction. Plain radiographs were obtained in two planes. All data were collected by an independent observer at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

resultsThirteen patients were excluded intra-operatively due to rotator cuff tears, fracture morphology or poor bone-quality. Of the remaining 68 patients, 27 in the LBN and 28 in the PHILOS group completed the full follow-up. Mean age at surgery was 75.6 years and the majority of PHFs were three-part fractures (49 patients). Baseline demographics between groups were comparable. All outcome measures improved between assessments (p < 0.001). The LBN group showed improved DASH scores as compared to PHILOS at 12 months (p = 0.042) with fewer incidences of secondary loss of reduction and screw cut-out (p = 0.039). A total of 29 complications (in 23 patients) were recorded, 13 complications (in 12 patients) in the LBN group and 16 complications (in 11 patients) in the PHILOS group (p = 0.941). No significant inter-group difference was observed for any other outcome measures, nor was fracture morphology seen to be associated with clinical outcome or complication rate.

conclusionsAt short-term follow-up, LBN osteosynthesis yielded similar outcomes and complication rates to PHILOS plate fracture fixation in an elderly patient population, though with a significantly lower rate of secondary loss of reduction and screw cut-out. REGISTRATION TRIAL: No. DRKS00015245 at Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien, registered: 22.08.2018, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBone NailsBone PlatesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularShoulder FracturesGeriatric traumatologyLocking proximal humeral nailLocking proximal humeral plateProximal humeral fracture

Identifiers

PMID30630465
PMCPMC6329164
OpenAlexW2911343876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.