Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30630266›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology journal2018

Trends in intensity-modulated radiation therapy use for rectal cancer in the neoadjuvant setting: a National Cancer Database analysis.

Rodney E Wegner, Stephen Abel, Richard J White, Zachary D Horne, Shaakir Hasan, Alexander V Kirichenko

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Dynamic conformal arc radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer: a comparison with static-beam conformal radiotherapy.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer in the UK in 2020.Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rodney E WegnerDivision of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Stephen AbelDivision of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Richard J WhiteDivision of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Zachary D HorneDivision of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Shaakir HasanDivision of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Alexander V KirichenkoDivision of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Allegheny Health Network · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTraditionally, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) is used for neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was later developed for more conformal dose distribution, with the potential for reduced toxicity across many disease sites. We sought to use the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to examine trends and predictors for IMRT use in rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe queried the NCDB from 2004 to 2015 for patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation to standard doses followed by surgical resection. Odds ratios were used to determine predictors of IMRT use. Univariable and multivariable Cox regressions were used to determine potential predictors of overall survival (OS). Propensity matching was used to account for any indication bias.

resultsAmong 21,490 eligible patients, 3,131 were treated with IMRT. IMRT use increased from 1% in 2004 to 22% in 2014. Predictors for IMRT use included increased N stage, higher comorbidity score, more recent year, treatment at an academic facility, increased income, and higher educational level. On propensity-adjusted, multivariable analysis, male gender, increased distance to facility, higher comorbidity score, IMRT technique, government insurance, African-American race, and non-metro location were predictive of worse OS. Of note, the complete response rate at time of surgery was 28% with non-IMRT and 21% with IMRT.

conclusionIMRT use has steadily increased in the treatment of rectal cancer, but still remains only a fraction of overall treatment technique, more often reserved for higher disease burden.

Indexed as

IMRTIntensity-modulated radiotherapyNational Cancer Database (NCDB)RadiotherapyRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID30630266
PMCPMC6361252
OpenAlexW2907511049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.