Trial reportJournal of the American College of Surgeons2019
Perioperative Bundle to Reduce Surgical Site Infection after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Trial report in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2023Pooled it
- The effect of intraoperative wound protector use on the risk of surgical site infections in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for the Prevention of Wound Complications After Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Reduce Surgical Site Infections after CRS/HIPEC.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Prevalence of and risk factors for surgical site infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Surgical Site Infections in Patients of Periampullary Carcinoma Undergoing Delayed Bile Duct Division (COMBILAST) in Whipple's Procedure: A Prospective Cohort Study.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Surgical management of biliary malignancy.Current problems in surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byDiscussion.2019
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPancreaticoduodenectomy is historically associated with incisional surgical site infection (iSSI) rates between 15% and 20%. Prospective studies have been mixed with respect to the benefit of individual interventions directed at decreasing iSSI. We hypothesized that the application of a perioperative bundle during pancreaticoduodenectomy would decrease the rate of iSSIs significantly.
methodsAn initial cohort of 150 consecutive post-pancreaticoduodenectomy patients were assessed within 2 to 4 weeks of operation to determine baseline iSSI rates. The CDC definition of iSSI was used. A 4-part perioperative bundle was then instituted for the second cohort of 150 patients. This bundle consisted of a double-ring wound protector, gown/glove and drape change before fascial closure, irrigation of the wound with bacitracin solution, and a negative-pressure wound dressing that was left in place until postoperative day 7 or day of discharge. Three-hundred patients provided 80% power to detect a 50% risk reduction in iSSIs.
resultsCohorts 1 and 2 were similar with respect to age (68 vs 69 years; p = 0.918), sex (male, 51% vs 55%; p = 0.644), BMI (26 vs 26 kg/m
conclusionsIn this cohort study of 300 consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, the implementation of a 4-part bundle decreased iSSI rate from 22% to 11%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.