Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30629992›Full record

ArticleResuscitation2019

A comparison of non-invasive versus invasive measures of intracranial pressure in hypoxic ischaemic brain injury after cardiac arrest.

Danilo Cardim, Donald E Griesdale, Philip N Ainslie, Chiara Robba, Leanne Calviello, Marek Czosnyka, Peter Smielewski, Mypinder S Sekhon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06057155 (Correlation Between Intracranial Pressure and Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measured With CLOSED Bundle in Patients With Acute Brain Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06057155 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Correlation Between Intracranial Pressure and Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measured With CLOSED Bundle in Patients With Acute Brain Injury: Multicenter Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di BolognaRan2024 to 2026Enrolled150ConditionsIntra Cerebral Hemorrhage, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal, Trauma, Brain, Hypertension IntracranialArmsultrasound optic nerve sheath diameter assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intraindividual Optic Nerve Sheath Variation and Intracranial Pressure Changes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Sonographic evaluation of intracranial hemodynamics and pressure after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An exploratory sub-study of the TAME trial.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Danilo CardimDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vancouver General Hospital, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada,. Electronic address: danilo.cardim@gmail.com.
Donald E GriesdaleDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vancouver General Hospital, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada,; Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada,; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Philip N AinslieDepartment of Health and Exercise Sciences, The University of British Columbia - Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Chiara RobbaAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Leanne CalvielloBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Marek CzosnykaBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; Institute of Electronic Systems, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland.
Peter SmielewskiBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Mypinder S SekhonDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Cambridge · GBOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITVancouver Coastal Health · CAWarsaw University of Technology · PL

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIncreased intracranial pressure (ICP) in hypoxic ischaemic brain injury (HIBI) can cause secondary ischaemic brain injury and culminate in brain death. Invasive ICP monitoring is limited by associated risks in HIBI patients. We sought to evaluate the agreement between invasive ICP measurements and non-invasive estimators of ICP (nICP) in HIBI patients.

methodsEligible consecutive adult (age>18) cardiac arrest patients with HIBI were included as part of a single centre prospective interventional study. Invasive ICP monitoring and nICP measurements were undertaken using: a) transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD), b) optic nerve sheet diameter ultrasound (ONSD) and c) jugular venous bulb pressure (JVP). Multiple measurements applied in linear mixed-effects models were considered to obtain the correlation coefficient between ICP and nICP as well as their predictive abilities to detect intracranial hypertension (ICP≥20mm Hg).

resultsEleven patients were included (median age of 47 [range 20-71], 8 males and 3 females). There was a linear relationship between ICP and nICP with ONSD (R=0.53 [p<0.0001]), JVP (R=0.38 [p<0.001]) and TCD (R=0.30 [p<0.01]). The ability to predict intracranial hypertension was highest for ONSD and TCD (area under the receiver operating curve (AUC)=0.96 [95% CI: 0.90-1.00] and AUC=0.91 [95% CI: 0.83-1.00], respectively). JVP presented the weakest prediction ability (AUC=0.75 [95% CI: 0.56-0.94]).

conclusionsONSD and TCD methods demonstrated agreement with invasively-monitored ICP, suggesting their potential roles in the detection of intracranial hypertension in HIBI after cardiac arrest.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHeart ArrestHumansHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainIntracranial HypertensionMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicOptic NerveProspective StudiesUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialCardiac arrestHypoxic ischaemic brain injuryNon-invasive intracranial pressureOptic nerve sheath diameter ultrasonographyTranscranial doppler ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID30629992
OpenAlexW2911225420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.