Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30629959›Full record

ArticleExperimental eye research2019

Effects of time-of-day on inhibition of lens-induced myopia by quinpirole, pirenzepine and atropine in chicks.

Debora L Nickla, Kelsey Jordan, Jane Yang, Puneet Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental eye research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Influence of time-of-day and light wavelengths on ocular responses to defocus.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. IMI 2021 Yearly Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Debora L NicklaThe New England College of Optometry, 424 Beacon St., Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: nicklad@neco.edu.
Kelsey JordanThe New England College of Optometry, 424 Beacon St., Boston, MA, USA.
Jane YangThe New England College of Optometry, 424 Beacon St., Boston, MA, USA.
Puneet SinghThe New England College of Optometry, 424 Beacon St., Boston, MA, USA.
New England College of Optometry · US

Funding

Vision, eye growth rhythms and retinal signals in refractive developmentR01EY025307 · NEI · NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI NICKLA, DEBORA L · 2016 to 2022
$3.6M
Ocular Diurnal Rhythms and Eye GrowthR01EY013636 · NEI · NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI NICKLA, DEBORA L · 2002 to 2012
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013636NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injections of the D2 dopamine receptor agonist quinpirole or the acetylcholine muscarinic receptor antagonists pirenzepine and atropine prevent the development of negative-lens-induced myopia in chicks by inhibiting ocular growth. Because ocular growth is diurnally rhythmic, we hypothesized that the efficacy for inhibition may depend on time of day. Chicks wore monocular -10D lenses for 5 days, starting at 12d of age. The light cycle was 12L/12D. The lens-wearing eye received daily intravitreal injections for 4 days, of 20 μl quinpirole (10 nmol), at the following times: 7:30 EST (lights-on; morning; n = 12), 12:00 (mid-day; n = 13), or 19:30 (evening; n = 17). The same protocol was used for pirenzepine (0.2 μmol) and atropine (18 nmol), at the following times: 8:30 EDT (lights-on; n = 10; n = 18), 14:00 (n = 10; n = 12), or 20:30 (n = 18; n = 16). Saline injections were done in separate groups of birds for all groups as controls, and the data combined (n = 28). Ocular dimensions were measured using A-scan ultrasonography on treatment day 1 at 12:00, and again on day 5 at 12:00; growth rate is defined as the change in axial length over 96 h. For quinpirole and pirenzepine, subsets (n's in Methods) of mid-day and evening groups were measured at 6 h intervals on day 5 (from 12:00 to 12:00) to obtain rhythm parameters for axial length and choroidal thickness; for atropine, only the mid-day group was measured. Refractions were measured on day 5 with a Hartinger's refractometer. For quinpirole and pirenzepine, mid-day injections were more effective at inhibiting ocular growth than evening (Exp-fellow: quinpirole: -68 vs 118 μm/96h; post-hoc Bonferroni p = 0.016; pirenzepine: 79 vs 215 μm/96h; p = 0.046). There were no between-group statistically significant differences for atropine. For quinpirole, the mid-day amplitude of the axial rhythm was smaller than for evening (95 vs 142 μm; p < 0.05), but there were no time-dependent effects on the rhythms for pirenzepine. For atropine, the amplitude of the axial-length rhythm was significantly larger than that for pirenzepine at mid-day. We conclude that there is a phase-dependent efficacy for quinpirole and pirenzepine, with mid-day injections being most effective. There were no consistent time-dependent alterations in rhythm parameters for any of the drugs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornAtropineChickensCircadian RhythmDopamine AgonistsDrug Administration ScheduleEyeIntravitreal InjectionsMuscarinic AntagonistsMyopiaPirenzepineQuinpiroleSensory DeprivationAtropineDopamine AgonistsMuscarinic AntagonistsPirenzepineQuinpiroleAcetylcholineAxial lengthChoroidDiurnal rhythmsDopamineMyopia

Identifiers

PMID30629959
PMCPMC6443441
OpenAlexW2909684910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.