Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30629780›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2019

Indigenous Peoples and genomics: Starting a conversation.

Jenny Morgan, Rachel R Coe, Rochelle Lesueur, Ruth Kenny, Roberta Price, Nancy Makela, Patricia H Birch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Data Governance in Health Research: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A content analysis of health-related epigenetic information in YouTube videos.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Genetic Counseling and Genome Sequencing in Pediatric Rare Disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jenny MorganIndigenous Health Program, BC Women's and Children's Hospitals, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Rachel R CoeDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1825-5357
Rochelle LesueurIndigenous Health Program, BC Women's and Children's Hospitals, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ruth KennyIndigenous Health Program, BC Women's and Children's Hospitals, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Roberta PriceIndigenous Health Program, BC Women's and Children's Hospitals, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Nancy MakelaDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Patricia H BirchDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3831-2344

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to European ancestral groups, Indigenous Canadians are more likely to have uninterpretable genome-wide sequencing results due to non-representation in reference databases. We began a conversation with Indigenous Canadians to raise awareness and give voice to this issue. We co-created a video explaining genomic non-representation that included diverse Indigenous view-points. We audio-recorded the focus groups including 30 First Nations, Métis, and Inuit individuals living in Greater Vancouver. After watching an introductory video explaining genomic testing, participants discussed issues surrounding collecting Indigenous genomic data, its control, and usage. Transcripts were analyzed, and participants' quotes representing main themes were incorporated into the introductory video. Indigenous participants discussed data interpretation and gave approval for quote usage. The 20 participants who provided feedback concurred with the thematic interpretation: Systemic racism interlaced most conversations, particularly within the theme of trust. Themes of governance emphasized privacy and fear of discrimination. Some participants thought a separate, Indigenous-controlled database was essential; others recognized advantages of international databases. The theme of implementation included creative ideas to collect Indigenous genomes, but prior approval from Indigenous leaders was emphasized. The final video (https://youtu.be/-wivIBDjoi8) was shared with participants to use as they wish to promote awareness and ongoing discussion of genomic diagnostic inequity.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingIndigenous PeoplesInuitAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaFemaleGenomicsHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services, IndigenousHumansIndians, North AmericanMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchFirst Nationsgenetic testing disparitiesgenomic sequencinghealthcare inequityIndigenous Peoplesreconciliationreference databases

Identifiers

PMID30629780
PMCPMC7379939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.