Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30629675›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

Low use of long-lasting insecticidal nets for malaria prevention in south-central Ethiopia: A community-based cohort study.

Tarekegn Solomon, Eskindir Loha, Wakgari Deressa, Taye Gari, Hans J Overgaard, Bernt Lindtjørn

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tarekegn SolomonSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-0923-2740
Eskindir LohaSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Wakgari DeressaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Taye GariSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Hans J OvergaardFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Akershus, Norway.
Bernt LindtjørnCentre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6267-6984
Hawassa University · ETAddis Ababa University · ETNorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA decline in malaria morbidity and mortality has been documented in Ethiopia since 2005 following a scale-up of the distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs). However, universal access to LLINs ownership and use has not yet been achieved. This study aimed to determine ownership and use of LLINs over time in south-central Ethiopia.

methodsA cohort of 17,142 individuals residing in 3,006 households was followed-up from October 2014 to January 2017 (121 weeks). New PermaNet2.0 LLINs were given to households in October 2014. Once per week, the LLIN use status was documented for each individual. A survey was conducted after 110 weeks of LLIN distribution to determine LLIN ownership. A multilevel negative binomial regression model was fitted to identify significant predictors of LLIN use.

resultsAt baseline, the LLIN ownership was 100%. After 110 weeks only 233 (8%) of the households owned at least one LLIN. The median proportion of LLIN use per individuals during the study period was only 14%. During the first year (week 1-52) the average LLIN use per individuals was 36% and during the second year (week 53-104) it was 4.6%. More frequent LLIN use was reported among age group [5-14 years (adjusted IRR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.22), 15-24 years (adjusted IRR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.23-1.45), ≥25 years (adjusted IRR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.83-2.17)] compared to <5 years, and household head educational status [read and write (adjusted IRR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.26), primary (adjusted IRR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.12-1.27), secondary or above (adjusted IRR = 1.20, 95% CI (1.11-1.30)] compared to illiterate. Having a family size of over five persons (adjusted IRR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.84) was associated with less frequent use of LLINs compared to a family size of ≤5 persons.

conclusionsThe study showed a low LLIN ownership after 110 weeks and a low LLIN use during 121 weeks of follow-up, despite 100% LLIN coverage at baseline. The study highlights the need to design strategies to increase LLIN ownership and use for setting similar to those studied here.

Indexed as

Insecticide-Treated BednetsMosquito ControlAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusEthiopiaFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMalariaMaleModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID30629675
PMCPMC6328101
OpenAlexW2909965463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.