ArticlePloS one2019
Consumer attitudes towards production diseases in intensive production systems.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Consumers' Attitudes towards Animal Suffering: A Systematic Review on Awareness, Willingness and Dietary Change.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- A Systematic Review on Commercially Available and Validated Sensor Technologies for Welfare Assessment of Dairy Cattle.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review on Validated Precision Livestock Farming Technologies for Pig Production and Its Potential to Assess Animal Welfare.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Pooled it
- Multidrug-resistance in backyard poultry and their link to management and biosecurity conditions in Eastern Spain.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Assessment of Bacterial Contamination and Antimicrobial Resistance ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Purine Metabolism and Hexosamine Biosynthetic Pathway Abnormalities in Diarrheal Weaned Piglets Identified Using Metabolomics.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Article
- Data recording and use of data tools for pig health management: perspectives of stakeholders in pig farming.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Causes of Post-Mortem Carcass and Organ Condemnations and Economic Loss Assessment in a Cattle Slaughterhouse.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Farmers' Perspectives of the Benefits and Risks in Precision Livestock Farming in the EU Pig and Poultry Sectors.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Cow Behavioural Activities in Extensive Farms: Challenges of Adopting Automatic Monitoring Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Food Credence Attributes: A Conceptual Framework of Supply Chain Stakeholders, Their Motives, and Mechanisms to Address Information Asymmetry.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Current Consumer Perceptions of Animal Welfare across Different Farming Sectors on the Island of Ireland.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Effects of Different Levels of Garlic Straw Powder on Growth Performance, Meat Quality, Antioxidant and Intestinal Mucosal Morphology of Yellow-Feathered Broilers.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Consumers' knowledge, attitude, and behavior towards antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in food production in China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Public Perceptions Regarding Genomic Technologies Applied to Breeding Farm Animals: A Qualitative Study.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2021Article
- Post-weaning diarrhea in pigs weaned without medicinal zinc: risk factors, pathogen dynamics, and association to growth rate.Porcine health management · 2021Article
- Comparison of 12 Different Animal Welfare Labeling Schemes in the Pig Sector.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Consumer Perceptions of Precision Livestock Farming-A Qualitative Study in Three European Countries.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Exploring Farmers' Reasons for Antibiotic Use and Misuse in Pig Farms in Brazil.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many members of the public and important stakeholders operating at the upper end of the food chain, may be unfamiliar with how food is produced, including within modern animal production systems. The intensification of production is becoming increasingly common in modern farming. However, intensive systems are particularly susceptible to production diseases, with potentially negative consequences for farm animal welfare (FAW). Previous research has demonstrated that the public are concerned about FAW, yet there has been little research into attitudes towards production diseases, and their approval of interventions to reduce these. This research explores the public's attitudes towards, and preferences for, FAW interventions in five European countries (Finland, Germany, Poland, Spain and the UK). An online survey was conducted for broilers (n = 789), layers (n = 790) and pigs (n = 751). Data were analysed by means of Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modelling. The results suggest that the public have concerns regarding intensive production systems, in relation to FAW, naturalness and the use of antibiotics. The most preferred interventions were the most "proactive" interventions, namely improved housing and hygiene measures. The least preferred interventions were medicine-based, which raised humane animal care and food safety concerns amongst respondents. The results highlighted the influence of the identified concerns, perceived risks and benefits on attitudes and subsequent behavioural intention, and the importance of supply chain stakeholders addressing these concerns in the subsequent communications with the public.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.