Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30629635›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Accurate, fast, data efficient and interpretable glaucoma diagnosis with automated spatial analysis of the whole cup to disc profile.

Ian J C MacCormick, Bryan M Williams, Yalin Zheng, Kun Li, Baidaa Al-Bander, Silvester Czanner, Rob Cheeseman, Colin E Willoughby, Emery N Brown, George L Spaeth and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Ian J C MacCormickDepartment of Eye & Vision Science, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Bryan M WilliamsDepartment of Eye & Vision Science, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Yalin ZhengDepartment of Eye & Vision Science, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Kun LiMedical Information Engineering Department, Taishan Medical School, TaiAn City, ShanDong Province, China.
Baidaa Al-BanderDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Electronics, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Silvester CzannerSchool of Computing, Mathematics and Digital Technology, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Rob CheesemanSt Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Colin E WilloughbyBiomedical Sciences Research Institute, Faculty of Life & Health Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1246-4166
Emery N BrownInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
George L SpaethGlaucoma Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Gabriela CzannerDepartment of Eye & Vision Science, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1157-2093
University of Liverpool · GBHarvard University · USManchester Metropolitan University · GBTaishan Medical University · CNUniversity of Ulster · GBWills Eye Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. It is a heterogeneous group of conditions with a common optic neuropathy and associated loss of peripheral vision. Both over and under-diagnosis carry high costs in terms of healthcare spending and preventable blindness. The characteristic clinical feature of glaucoma is asymmetrical optic nerve rim narrowing, which is difficult for humans to quantify reliably. Strategies to improve and automate optic disc assessment are therefore needed to prevent sight loss.

methodsWe developed a novel glaucoma detection algorithm that segments and analyses colour photographs to quantify optic nerve rim consistency around the whole disc at 15-degree intervals. This provides a profile of the cup/disc ratio, in contrast to the vertical cup/disc ratio in common use. We introduce a spatial probabilistic model, to account for the optic nerve shape, we then use this model to derive a disc deformation index and a decision rule for glaucoma. We tested our algorithm on two separate image datasets (ORIGA and RIM-ONE).

resultsThe spatial algorithm accurately distinguished glaucomatous and healthy discs on internal and external validation (AUROC 99.6% and 91.0% respectively). It achieves this using a dataset 100-times smaller than that required for deep learning algorithms, is flexible to the type of cup and disc segmentation (automated or semi-automated), utilises images with missing data, and is correlated with the disc size (p = 0.02) and the rim-to-disc at the narrowest rim (p<0.001, in external validation). DISCUSSION: The spatial probabilistic algorithm is highly accurate, highly data efficient and it extends to any imaging hardware in which the boundaries of cup and disc can be segmented, thus making the algorithm particularly applicable to research into disease mechanisms, and also glaucoma screening in low resource settings.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalGlaucomaHumansModels, StatisticalOptic DiskOptic NerveSpatial AnalysisSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID30629635
PMCPMC6328156
OpenAlexW2908790290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.