ArticlePloS one2019
Accurate, fast, data efficient and interpretable glaucoma diagnosis with automated spatial analysis of the whole cup to disc profile.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Literature Review of 3D Deep Learning Techniques in Computed Tomography Reconstruction.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Pooled it
- Deep Learning in Glaucoma Detection and Progression Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: Glaucoma, Cornea, and Oculoplastics.Cureus · 2024Review
- PallorMetrics: Software for Automatically Quantifying Optic Disc Pallor in Fundus Photographs, and Associations With Peripapillary RNFL Thickness.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Glaucoma Detection and Classification Using Improved U-Net Deep Learning Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Methods and Equipment for Aiding Automatic Glaucoma Tracking.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Segmentation and Classification of Glaucoma Using U-Net with Deep Learning Model.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- EffUnet-SpaGen: An Efficient and Spatial Generative Approach to Glaucoma Detection.Journal of imaging · 2021Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2021Review
- Explainable Machine Learning Model for Glaucoma Diagnosis and Its Interpretation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A CNN-aided method to predict glaucoma progression using DARC (Detection of Apoptosing Retinal Cells).Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2020Article
- Spatial Linear Mixed Effects Modelling for OCT Images: SLME Model.Journal of imaging · 2020Article
- Spatial and spatio-temporal statistical analyses of retinal images: a review of methods and applications.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2020Review
- Article
- Highly Accurate and Precise Automated Cup-to-Disc Ratio Quantification for Glaucoma Screening.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. It is a heterogeneous group of conditions with a common optic neuropathy and associated loss of peripheral vision. Both over and under-diagnosis carry high costs in terms of healthcare spending and preventable blindness. The characteristic clinical feature of glaucoma is asymmetrical optic nerve rim narrowing, which is difficult for humans to quantify reliably. Strategies to improve and automate optic disc assessment are therefore needed to prevent sight loss.
methodsWe developed a novel glaucoma detection algorithm that segments and analyses colour photographs to quantify optic nerve rim consistency around the whole disc at 15-degree intervals. This provides a profile of the cup/disc ratio, in contrast to the vertical cup/disc ratio in common use. We introduce a spatial probabilistic model, to account for the optic nerve shape, we then use this model to derive a disc deformation index and a decision rule for glaucoma. We tested our algorithm on two separate image datasets (ORIGA and RIM-ONE).
resultsThe spatial algorithm accurately distinguished glaucomatous and healthy discs on internal and external validation (AUROC 99.6% and 91.0% respectively). It achieves this using a dataset 100-times smaller than that required for deep learning algorithms, is flexible to the type of cup and disc segmentation (automated or semi-automated), utilises images with missing data, and is correlated with the disc size (p = 0.02) and the rim-to-disc at the narrowest rim (p<0.001, in external validation). DISCUSSION: The spatial probabilistic algorithm is highly accurate, highly data efficient and it extends to any imaging hardware in which the boundaries of cup and disc can be segmented, thus making the algorithm particularly applicable to research into disease mechanisms, and also glaucoma screening in low resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.