Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30629621›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Palliative cerebrospinal fluid shunting for leptomeningeal metastasis-related hydrocephalus in patients with lung adenocarcinoma: A single-center retrospective study.

Koichi Mitsuya, Yoko Nakasu, Nakamasa Hayashi, Shoichi Deguchi, Toshiaki Takahashi, Haruyasu Murakami, Tateaki Naito, Hirotsugu Kenmotsu, Akira Ono, Kazushige Wakuda and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Koichi MitsuyaDivision of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8956-5427
Yoko NakasuDivision of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Nakamasa HayashiDivision of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Shoichi DeguchiDivision of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Toshiaki TakahashiDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Haruyasu MurakamiDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Tateaki NaitoDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hirotsugu KenmotsuDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Akira OnoDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kazushige WakudaDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hideyuki HaradaDivision of Radiation Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Shizuoka Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeManagement of leptomeningeal metastasis-related hydrocephalus (LM-H) is particularly challenging regarding the control of severe headache, nausea, and vomiting due to intracranial hypertension. To investigate the improvements of performance status and outcome with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt surgery for LM-H in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

methodsData on patients with leptomeningeal metastasis-related hydrocephalus from lung adenocarcinoma diagnosed by MR imaging and/or cytological examination were retrospectively analyzed. Between August 2008 and July 2017, the authors reviewed 31 patients requiring CSF shunt, who underwent ventriculo-peritoneal or lumbo-peritoneal shunt.

resultsThe patients consisted of 11 men and 20 women with a median age of 59 years. Twenty-six patients received EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). CSF shunt surgery yielded rapid improvement in the performance status of 90.3% of patients. Median overall survival from the diagnosis of LM in patients with ECOG performance status less than 2 was 7.7 months, and this was significantly longer than those in patients with PS 3 or 4 (4.4 or 1.5 months; p<0.001). Multivariate analysis by Cox regression revealed survival differences according to PS at diagnosis of LM [PS 1-3 vs. PS4, hazard ratio (HR) 0.201, p = 0.034], controlled extracranial disease (HR 0.248, p = 0.005), and post-shunt EGFR-TKI for LM treatment (HR 0.193, p = 0.008). Postoperative symptomatic peritoneal carcinomatosis was observed in one patient (3.2%).

conclusionCSF shunting may be a safe and effective strategy in patients with LM-H from lung adenocarcinoma. A prospective study is needed to establish the effectiveness and safety of palliative CSF shunt for LM-H.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedCerebrospinal Fluid ShuntsFemaleHumansHydrocephalusKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMiddle AgedProtein Kinase InhibitorsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID30629621
PMCPMC6328154
OpenAlexW2910917771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.