Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30629619›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Evaluation of a national cryptococcal antigen screening program for HIV-infected patients in Uganda: A cost-effectiveness modeling analysis.

Radha Rajasingham, David B Meya, Gregory S Greene, Alexander Jordan, Mina Nakawuka, Tom M Chiller, David R Boulware, Bruce A Larson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cryptococcal andOpen forum infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Radha RajasinghamDivision of Infectious Diseases & International Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5531-0231
David B MeyaInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Gregory S GreeneMycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7021-259X
Alexander JordanMycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7834-866X
Mina NakawukaAIDS Control Program, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Tom M ChillerMycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
David R BoulwareDivision of Infectious Diseases & International Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4715-0060
Bruce A LarsonDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9322-2387
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of Minnesota · USBoston University · USInfectious Diseases Institute · UGMinistry of Health · UG

Funding

Evaluation of CRAG screening with enhanced antifungal therapy for asymptomatic CRAG-positive personsK23AI138851 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI RAJASINGHAM, RADHA · 2018 to 2022
$954k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI138851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCryptococcal meningitis accounts for 15% of AIDS-related mortality. Cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) is detected in blood weeks before onset of meningitis, and CrAg positivity is an independent predictor of meningitis and death. CrAg screening for patients with advanced HIV and preemptive treatment is recommended by the World Health Organization, though implementation remains limited. Our objective was to evaluate costs and mortality reduction (lives saved) from a national CrAg screening program across Uganda.

methodsWe created a decision analytic model to evaluate CrAg screening. CrAg screening was considered for those with a CD4<100 cells/μL per national and international guidelines, and in the context of a national HIV test-and-treat program where CD4 testing was not available. Costs (2016 USD) were estimated for screening, preemptive therapy, hospitalization, and maintenance therapy. Parameter assumptions were based on large prospective CrAg screening studies in Uganda, and clinical trials from sub Saharan Africa. CrAg positive (CrAg+) persons could be: (a) asymptomatic and thus eligible for preemptive treatment with fluconazole; or (b) symptomatic with meningitis with hospitalization.

resultsIn the base case model for 1 million persons with a CD4 test annually, 128,000 with a CD4<100 cells/μL were screened, and 8,233 were asymptomatic CrAg+ and received preemptive therapy. Compared to no screening and treatment, CrAg screening and treatment in the base case cost $3,356,724 compared to doing nothing, and saved 7,320 lives, for a cost of $459 per life saved, with the $3.3 million in cost savings derived from fewer patients developing fulminant meningitis. In the scenario of a national HIV test-and-treat program, of 1 million HIV-infected persons, 800,000 persons were screened, of whom 640,000 returned to clinic, and 8,233 were incident CrAg positive (CrAg prevalence 1.4%). The total cost of a CrAg screening and treatment program was $4.16 million dollars, with 2,180 known deaths. Conversely, without CrAg screening, the cost of treating meningitis was $3.09 million dollars with 3,806 deaths. Thus, despite the very low CrAg prevalence of 1.4% in the general HIV-infected population, and inadequate retention-in-care, CrAg screening averted 43% of deaths from cryptococcal meningitis at a cost of $662 per death averted.

conclusionCrAg screening and treatment programs are cost-saving and lifesaving, assuming preemptive treatment is 77% effective in preventing death, and could be adopted and implemented by ministries of health to reduce mortality in those with advanced HIV disease. Even within HIV test-and-treat programs where CD4 testing is not performed, and CrAg prevalence is only 1.4%, CrAg screening is cost-effective.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAdultAIDS-Related Opportunistic InfectionsAntifungal AgentsAntigens, FungalCD4 Lymphocyte CountCryptococcusDecision Support TechniquesHospitalizationHumansMass ScreeningMeningitis, CryptococcalModels, EconomicPractice Guidelines as TopicPrevalenceProgram EvaluationAntifungal AgentsAntigens, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID30629619
PMCPMC6328136
OpenAlexW2910130606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.