Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30629598›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Systematic review of quality of life measures in patients with endometriosis.

Nicolas Bourdel, Pauline Chauvet, Valentina Billone, Giannis Douridas, Arnaud Fauconnier, Laurent Gerbaud, Michel Canis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06611501 (Glycemic Regulation as Endometriosis Adjunct Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06611501 phase2active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Glycemic Regulation as Endometriosis Adjunct Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston Children's HospitalRan2025 to 2027Enrolled14ConditionsPelvic Pain, EndometriosisArmsMetformin Hydrochloride, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Clinical practice guidelines for endometriosis in Japan (The 3rd edition).The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2022
    Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Impact of adverse childhood experiences on health-related quality of life in Australian women with endometriosis: a population-based cohort study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Consensus on Symptom Selection for Endometriosis Questionnaires: A Modified e-Delphi Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicolas BourdelDepartment of Gynaecological Surgery, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5527-4370
Pauline ChauvetDepartment of Gynaecological Surgery, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Valentina BilloneDepartment of Mother and Child, University Hospital P. Giaccone, Palermo, Italy.
Giannis DouridasDepartment of Gynaecological Surgery, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Arnaud FauconnierDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, EA 7285 Research Unit 'Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health', Versailles-Saint-Quentin University (UVSQ), Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Laurent GerbaudDept of Public Health, PEPRADE, Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, France, CNRS, SIGMA Clermont, Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Michel CanisDepartment of Gynaecological Surgery, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEndometriosis and quality of life has been the subject of much research, however, there is little consensus on how best to evaluate quality of life in endometriosis, resulting in many and diverse scales being used. In our study, we aim to identify quality of life scales used in endometriosis, to review their strengths and weaknesses and to establish what would define an ideal scale in the evaluation of endometriosis-related quality of life. MATERIALS AND

methodsA search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was carried out for publications in English and French for the period from 1980 to February 2017, using the words 'endometriosis' and 'quality of life'. Publications were selected if they reported on quality of life in patients with endometriosis and specified use of a quality of life scale. A quantitative and a qualitative analysis of each scale was performed in order to establish the strengths and weaknesses for each scale (systematic registration number: PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014014210).

resultsA total of 1538 articles publications were initially identified. After exclusion of duplicates and application of inclusion criteria, 201 studies were selected for analysis. The SF-36, a generic HRQoL measure, was found to be the most frequently used scale, followed by the EHP-30, a measure specific to endometriosis. Both perform well, when compared with other scales, with scale weaknesses offset by strengths. EHP-5 and EQ-5D also showed to be of good quality. All four were the only scales to report on MCID studied in endometriosis patients.

conclusionFor clinical practice, routine evaluation of HRQOL in women with endometriosis is essential both for health-care providers and patients. Both SF-36 and EHP-30 perform better overall with regard to their strengths and weaknesses when compared to other scales.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdvisory CommitteesCanadaEndometriosisFemaleHealth SurveysHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30629598
PMCPMC6328109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.