ArticlePloS one2019
First complete chloroplast genomics and comparative phylogenetic analysis of Commiphora gileadensis and C. foliacea: Myrrh producing trees.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Comparative and phylogenetic study on the chloroplast genomes of CMS with the cytoplasm of Aegilops ovata and its maintainer line in wheat.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Chloroplast genome, an effective strategy for identifying hybrid species, using Dendrobium 'Black Gold' as an example.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Plastome structure, evolution and diversity of Frankincense-producing Boswellia genus.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes reveals molecular evolution and phylogenetic relationships within the Papilionoideae of Fabaceae.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Complete chloroplast genome of eight Phaius (Orchidaceae) species from China: comparative analysis and phylogenetic relationship.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Deciphering insights into commercial Myrrh species authenticity from the psbA-trsnH genetic region.PloS one · 2025Article
- The Genus Commiphora: An Overview of Its Traditional Uses, Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, and Quality Control.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Complete chloroplast genome structural characterization of two Aerides (Orchidaceae) species with a focus on phylogenetic position of Aerides flabellata.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Twelve newly assembled jasmine chloroplast genomes: unveiling genomic diversity, phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary patterns among Oleaceae and Jasminum species.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- The complete chloroplast genome of Mussaenda pubescens and phylogenetic analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Complete chloroplast genomes of three copal trees (Bursera: Bullockia): comparative analysis and phylogenetic relationships.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- Complete Chloroplast Genomes ofCurrent genomics · 2023Article
- Comparative Phylogenetic Analysis forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Comparative genomics analysis of endangered wild EgyptianFrontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Comparative analysis of chloroplast genome and new insights into phylogenetic relationships ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Development of Genomic Resources in MexicanGenes · 2022Article
- Analysis of complete chloroplast genome sequences and insight into the phylogenetic relationships of Ferula L.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- The Plastome Sequences ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Uncovering the first complete plastome genomics, comparative analyses, and phylogenetic dispositions of endemic medicinal plant Ziziphus hajarensis (Rhamnaceae).BMC genomics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Commiphora gileadensis and C. foliacea (family Burseraceae) are pantropical in nature and known for producing fragrant resin (myrrh). Both the tree species are economically and medicinally important however, least genomic understanding is available for this genus. Herein, we report the complete chloroplast genome sequences of C. gileadensis and C. foliacea and comparative analysis with related species (C. wightii and Boswellia sacra). A modified chloroplast DNA extraction method was adopted, followed with next generation sequencing, detailed bioinformatics and PCR analyses. The results revealed that the cp genome sizes of C. gileadensis and C. foliacea, are 160,268 and 160,249 bp, respectively, with classic quadripartite structures that comprises of inverted repeat's pair. Overall, the organization of these cp genomes, GC contents, gene order, and codon usage were comparable to other cp genomes in angiosperm. Approximately, 198 and 175 perfect simple sequence repeats were detected in C. gileadensis and C. foliacea genomes, respectively. Similarly, 30 and 25 palindromic, 15 and 25 forward, and 20 and 25 tandem repeats were determined in both the cp genomes, respectively. Comparison of these complete cp genomes with C. wightii and B. sacra revealed significant sequence resemblance and comparatively highest deviation in intergenic spacers. The phylo-genomic comparison showed that C. gileadensis and C. foliacea form a single clade with previously reported C. wightii and B. sacra from family Burseraceae. Current study reports for the first time the cp genomics of species from Commiphora, which could be helpful in understanding genetic diversity and phylogeny of this myrrh producing species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.