ArticlePloS one2019
Computational prediction of diagnosis and feature selection on mesothelioma patient health records.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cancer Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning for Supporting Early Cancer Diagnosis in Symptomatic Patients: A Systematic Review of Model Types.Cancer medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning algorithms for identifying tuberculous pericardial effusion: insights from a retrospective study in Vietnam.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Probabilistic Neural Networks: An Overview.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Article
- Explainable AI for CHO cell culture media optimization and prediction of critical quality attribute.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Ensemble machine learning reveals key features for diabetes duration from electronic health records.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- A comprehensive analysis and performance evaluation for osteoporosis prediction models.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence with temporal features outperforms machine learning in predicting diabetes.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- Machine learning-based risk prediction model for canine myxomatous mitral valve disease using electronic health record data.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Applications of Neural Network-Based Plan-Cancer Method for Primary Diagnosis of Mesothelioma Cancer.BioMed research international · 2023Article
- A Proposed Framework for Early Prediction of Schistosomiasis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Machine learning based risk prediction for Parkinson's disease with nationwide health screening data.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Identification of High Death Risk Coronavirus Disease-19 Patients using Blood Tests.Advanced biomedical research · 2022Article
- Feature Selection Using Correlation Analysis and Principal Component Analysis for Accurate Breast Cancer Diagnosis.Journal of imaging · 2021Article
- Prediction Models of Early Childhood Caries Based on Machine Learning Algorithms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Predicting Treatment Outcomes Using Explainable Machine Learning in Children with Asthma.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Prediction of hematocrit through imbalanced dataset of blood spectra.Healthcare technology letters · 2021Article
- Data analytics and clinical feature ranking of medical records of patients with sepsis.BioData mining · 2021Article
- Data-Driven Prediction of Fatigue in Parkinson's Disease Patients.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2021Article
- Adaptive Diagnosis of Lung Cancer by Deep Learning Classification Using Wilcoxon Gain and Generator.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMesothelioma is a lung cancer that kills thousands of people worldwide annually, especially those with exposure to asbestos. Diagnosis of mesothelioma in patients often requires time-consuming imaging techniques and biopsies. Machine learning can provide for a more effective, cheaper, and faster patient diagnosis and feature selection from clinical data in patient records. METHODS AND
findingsWe analyzed a dataset of health records of 324 patients having mesothelioma symptoms from Turkey. The patients had prior asbestos exposure and displayed symptoms consistent with mesothelioma. We compared probabilistic neural network, perceptron-based neural network, random forest, one rule, and decision tree classifiers to predict diagnosis of the patient records. We measured classifiers' performance through standard confusion matrix scores such as Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). Random forest outperformed all models tried, obtaining MCC = +0.37 on the complete imbalanced dataset and MCC = +0.64 on the under-sampled balanced dataset. We then employed random forest feature selection to identify the two most relevant dataset traits associated with mesothelioma: lung side and platelet count. These two risk factors resulted so predictive, that decision tree focusing on them achieved the second top accuracy on the complete dataset diagnosis prediction (MCC = +0.28), outperforming all other methods and even decision tree itself applied to all features.
conclusionsOur results show that machine learning can predict diagnoses of patients having mesothelioma symptoms with high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, in few minutes. Additionally, random forest can efficiently select the most important features of this clinical dataset (lung side and platelet count) in few seconds. The importance of pleural plaques in lung sides and blood platelets in mesothelioma diagnosis indicates that physicians should focus on these two features when reading records of patients with mesothelioma symptoms. Moreover, doctors can exploit our machinery to predict patient diagnosis when only lung side and platelet data are available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.