Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30629472›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2019

Evaluating physiological signal salience for estimating metabolic energy cost from wearable sensors.

Kimberly A Ingraham, Daniel P Ferris, C David Remy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A Data-Driven Approach to Estimate Changes in Peak Knee Contact Force With Exoskeleton Assistance.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Perturbation-based estimation of within-stride cycle metabolic cost.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly A IngrahamDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Daniel P FerrisJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida.
C David RemyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Evaluating and Improving Assistive Robotic Devices Continuously and in Real-timeR03HD092639 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GATES, DEANNA H. · 2018 to 2019
$156k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD092639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body-in-the-loop optimization algorithms have the capability to automatically tune the parameters of robotic prostheses and exoskeletons to minimize the metabolic energy expenditure of the user. However, current body-in-the-loop algorithms rely on indirect calorimetry to obtain measurements of energy cost, which are noisy, sparsely sampled, time-delayed, and require wearing a respiratory mask. To improve these algorithms, the goal of this work is to predict a user's steady-state energy cost quickly and accurately using physiological signals obtained from portable, wearable sensors. In this paper, we quantified physiological signal salience to discover which signals, or groups of signals, have the best predictive capability when estimating metabolic energy cost. We collected data from 10 healthy individuals performing 6 activities (walking, incline walking, backward walking, running, cycling, and stair climbing) at various speeds or intensities. Subjects wore a suite of physiological sensors that measured breath frequency and volume, limb accelerations, lower limb EMG, heart rate, electrodermal activity, skin temperature, and oxygen saturation; indirect calorimetry was used to establish the 'ground truth' energy cost for each activity. Evaluating Pearson's correlation coefficients and single and multiple linear regression models with cross validation (leave-one- subject-out and leave-one- task-out), we found that 1) filtering the accelerations and EMG signals improved their predictive power, 2) global signals (e.g., heart rate, electrodermal activity) were more sensitive to unknown subjects than tasks, while local signals (e.g., accelerations) were more sensitive to unknown tasks than subjects, and 3) good predictive performance was obtained combining a small number of signals (4-5) from multiple sensor modalities. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this paper, we systematically compare a large set of physiological signals collected from portable sensors and determine which sensor signals contain the most salient information for predicting steady-state metabolic energy cost, robust to unknown subjects or tasks. This information, together with the comprehensive data set that is published in conjunction with this paper, will enable researchers and clinicians across many fields to develop novel algorithms to predict energy cost from wearable sensors.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsCalorimetry, IndirectElectromyographyEnergy MetabolismExtremitiesFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMasksWalkingWearable Electronic Devicesbiomechanicsenergeticsexerciselocomotionmetabolics

Identifiers

PMID30629472
PMCPMC6459384
OpenAlexW2910481531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.