Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30629299›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2019

Multicenter CT phantoms public dataset for radiomics reproducibility tests.

Petros Kalendralis, Alberto Traverso, Zhenwei Shi, Ivan Zhovannik, René Monshouwer, Martijn P A Starmans, Stefan Klein, Elisabeth Pfaehler, Ronald Boellaard, Andre Dekker and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Proton FLASH-arc therapy (PFAT): A feasibility study for meeting FLASH dose-rate requirements in the clinic.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Radiomics: A Primer on Processing Workflow and Analysis.Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Petros KalendralisMAASTRO Clinic and School for Oncology and Development Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alberto TraversoMAASTRO Clinic and School for Oncology and Development Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Zhenwei ShiMAASTRO Clinic and School for Oncology and Development Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ivan ZhovannikMAASTRO Clinic and School for Oncology and Development Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
René MonshouwerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Martijn P A StarmansDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stefan KleinDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth PfaehlerUniversity Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ronald BoellaardDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU Medical Center, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Andre DekkerMAASTRO Clinic and School for Oncology and Development Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Leonard WeeMAASTRO Clinic and School for Oncology and Development Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLErasmus MC · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

Dutch Cancer SocietyDutch STW-Perspectief Research Program 14929Dutch STW-Perspectief Research Program 14930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this paper is to describe a public, open-access, computed tomography (CT) phantom image set acquired at three centers and collected especially for radiomics reproducibility research. The dataset is useful to test radiomic features reproducibility with respect to various parameters, such as acquisition settings, scanners, and reconstruction algorithms. ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION

methodsThree phantoms were scanned in three independent institutions. Images of the following phantoms were acquired: Catphan 700 and COPDGene Phantom II (Phantom Laboratory, Greenwich, NY, USA), and the Triple modality 3D Abdominal Phantom (CIRS, Norfolk, VA, USA). Data were collected at three Dutch medical centers: MAASTRO Clinic (Maastricht, NL), Radboud University Medical Center (Nijmegen, NL), and University Medical Center Groningen (Groningen, NL) with scanners from two different manufacturers Siemens Healthcare and Philips Healthcare. The following acquisition parameter were varied in the phantom scans: slice thickness, reconstruction kernels, and tube current. DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES: We made the dataset publically available on the Dutch instance of "Extensible Neuroimaging Archive Toolkit-XNAT" (https://xnat.bmia.nl). The dataset is freely available and reusable with attribution (Creative Commons 3.0 license). POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS: Our goal was to provide a findable, open-access, annotated, and reusable CT phantom dataset for radiomics reproducibility studies. Reproducibility testing and harmonization are fundamental requirements for wide generalizability of radiomics-based clinical prediction models. It is highly desirable to include only reproducible features into models, to be more assured of external validity across hitherto unseen contexts. In this view, phantom data from different centers represent a valuable source of information to exclude CT radiomic features that may already be unstable with respect to simplified structures and tightly controlled scan settings. The intended extension of our shared dataset is to include other modalities and phantoms with more realistic lesion simulations.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualPhantoms, ImagingRadiography, AbdominalRadiography, ThoracicAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMulticenter Studies as TopicPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID30629299
PMCPMC6849778
OpenAlexW2910125765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.