Observational studyJournal of the National Cancer Institute2019
An Observational Study of Deep Learning and Automated Evaluation of Cervical Images for Cancer Screening.
Observational study in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 189 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Look at the Patterns in Medical Research Participation Among Patients With Cervical Cancer
Validation of a Lab-free Low-cost Screening Test for Prevention of Cervical Cancer: Automated Visual Evaluation
Who cites it
189 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 387 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of AI Algorithms in Aortic Stenosis Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical medicine & research · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for classification and detection of oral mucosa lesions on photographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review of handheld tools in lieu of colposcopy for cervical neoplasia and female genital schistosomiasis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021Pooled it
- Screening test accuracy of portable devices that can be used to perform colposcopy for detecting CIN2+ in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC women's health · 2020Pooled it
- Reporting and Assessing the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management.Journal of lower genital tract disease · 2020Pooled it
- Using deep learning to predict survival outcome in non-surgical cervical cancer patients based on pathological images.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Trial
- A multi-omics-based investigation of the prognostic and immunological impact of necroptosis-related mRNA in patients with cervical squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Cervical lesion assessment using real-time microendoscopy image analysis in Brazil: The CLARA study.International journal of cancer · 2021Trial
- From HPV infection to cervical precancer: Molecular mechanisms, immune microenvironment and emerging technologies.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- Frugal AI is the missing piece in cervical cancer screening.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Automated acquisition of explainable knowledge from unannotated colposcopic images for predicting the natural course of CIN2.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in oncology: linking biological discovery to clinical utility.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Virus infections and cancers: from mechanisms to therapeutics.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing: Clinical, Educational, and Ethical Perspectives.Cureus · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Cervical Cell Morphologies from Android Device-Captured Cytopathological Microscopic Images through Artificial Intelligence in Mainly Rural or Resource-Constraint Areas of India.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- RE: An observational study of deep learning and automated evaluation of cervical images for cancer screening.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Women's Healthcare: A Systematic Review.Qatar medical journal · 2026Review
- Deep Learning and Attention Mechanism-based Prediction of Vaginal Invasion in Early-Stage Cervical CancerCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHuman papillomavirus vaccination and cervical screening are lacking in most lower resource settings, where approximately 80% of more than 500 000 cancer cases occur annually. Visual inspection of the cervix following acetic acid application is practical but not reproducible or accurate. The objective of this study was to develop a "deep learning"-based visual evaluation algorithm that automatically recognizes cervical precancer/cancer.
methodsA population-based longitudinal cohort of 9406 women ages 18-94 years in Guanacaste, Costa Rica was followed for 7 years (1993-2000), incorporating multiple cervical screening methods and histopathologic confirmation of precancers. Tumor registry linkage identified cancers up to 18 years. Archived, digitized cervical images from screening, taken with a fixed-focus camera ("cervicography"), were used for training/validation of the deep learning-based algorithm. The resultant image prediction score (0-1) could be categorized to balance sensitivity and specificity for detection of precancer/cancer. All statistical tests were two-sided.
resultsAutomated visual evaluation of enrollment cervigrams identified cumulative precancer/cancer cases with greater accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.89 to 0.93) than original cervigram interpretation (AUC = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.74; P < .001) or conventional cytology (AUC = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.77; P < .001). A single visual screening round restricted to women at the prime screening ages of 25-49 years could identify 127 (55.7%) of 228 precancers (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3/adenocarcinoma in situ [AIS]) diagnosed cumulatively in the entire adult population (ages 18-94 years) while referring 11.0% for management.
conclusionsThe results support consideration of automated visual evaluation of cervical images from contemporary digital cameras. If achieved, this might permit dissemination of effective point-of-care cervical screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.