Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30628959›Full record

ArticleChinese medical journal2019

Application of a novel porous tantalum implant in rabbit anterior lumbar spine fusion model: in vitro and in vivo experiments.

Ming Lu, Song Xu, Zi-Xiong Lei, Dong Lu, Wei Cao, Marko Huttula, Chang-He Hou, Shao-Hua Du, Wei Chen, Shuang-Wu Dai and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Biomaterials for Interbody Fusion in Bone Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Tantalum: the next biomaterial in spine surgery?Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ming LuDepartment of Orthopedic, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Song XuDepartment of Arthroplasty, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China.
Zi-Xiong LeiDepartment of Orthopedic, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Dong LuNing Xia Orient Tantalum Industry Co. Ltd, Shizuishan, Ningxia 753000, China.
Wei CaoDepartment of Physics, University of Oulu, Oulu FIN-90014, Finland.
Marko HuttulaDepartment of Physics, University of Oulu, Oulu FIN-90014, Finland.
Chang-He HouDepartment of Orthopedic, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Shao-Hua DuDepartment of Orthopedic, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Wei ChenDepartment of Orthopedic, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Shuang-Wu DaiDepartment of Orthopedic, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Hao-Miao LiDepartment of Orthopedic, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Da-Di JinDepartment of Orthopedic, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China.
Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University · CNNanfang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome porous materials have been developed to enhance biologic fusion of the implants to bone in spine fusion surgeries. However, there are several inherent limitations. In this study, a novel biomedical porous tantalum was applied to in vitro and in vivo experiments to test its biocompatibility and osteocompatibility.

methodsBone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were cultured on porous tantalum implant. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Cell Counting Kit-8 assay were used to evaluate the cell toxicity and biocompatibility. Twenty-four rabbits were performed discectomy only (control group), discectomy with autologous bone implanted (autograft group), and discectomy with porous tantalum implanted (tantalum group) at 3 levels: L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-L6 in random order. All the 24 rabbits were randomly sacrificed at the different post-operative times (2, 4, 6, and 12 months; n = 6 at each time point). Histologic examination and micro-computed tomography scans were done to evaluate the fusion process. Comparison of fusion index scores between groups was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. Other comparisons of numerical variables between groups were made by Student t test.

resultsAll rabbits survived and recovered without any symptoms of nerve injury. Radiographic fusion index scores at 12 months post-operatively between autograft and tantalum groups showed no significant difference (2.89 ± 0.32 vs. 2.83 ± 0.38, F = 244.60, P = 0.709). Cell Counting Kit-8 assay showed no significant difference of absorbance values between the leaching liquor group and control group (1.25 ± 0.06 vs. 1.23 ± 0.04, t = -0.644, P = 0.545), which indicated the BMSC proliferation without toxicity. SEM images showed that these cells had irregular shapes with long spindles adhered to the surface of tantalum implant. No implant degradation, wear debris, or osteolysis was observed. Histologic results showed solid fusion in the porous tantalum and autologous bone implanted intervertebral spaces.

conclusionThis novel porous tantalum implant showed a good biocompatibility and osteocompatibility, which could be a valid biomaterial for interbody fusion cages.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell ProliferationDiskectomyLumbar VertebraeMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningProstheses and ImplantsRabbitsSpinal FusionTantalumTantalum

Identifiers

PMID30628959
PMCPMC6629310
OpenAlexW2911158738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.