ArticleChinese medical journal2019
Application of a novel porous tantalum implant in rabbit anterior lumbar spine fusion model: in vitro and in vivo experiments.
Article in Chinese medical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural changes of the multifidus in animal models of intervertebral disk degeneration: a systematic review.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Pooled it
- In Situ Tantalum Doping of Titanium Dioxide Nanotubes via Electrochemical Method for Enhanced Mechanical and Biological Properties.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Porosity optimization confers 3D-printed porous tantalum scaffolds with superior osteogenic capability and biocompatibility over titanium alloys.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional-Printed Porous Tantalum Wedge Shows Promising Early Results for Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Retrospective Comparative Study With Mean 50-Month Follow-Up.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Quadratus lumborum block at lateral supra-arcuate ligament versus erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia and postoperative recovery in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Rapid preparation of bioactive composites for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of biological performance of 3D printed trabecular porous tantalum spine fusion cage in large animal models.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
- Animal Model for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Literature Review.Spine surgery and related research · 2024Review
- Innovative Developments in Lumbar Interbody Cage Materials and Design: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Asian spine journal · 2024Article
- Metal-polyphenol networks-modified tantalum plate for craniomaxillofacial reconstruction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Research progress and clinical translation of three-dimensional printed porous tantalum in orthopaedics.Biomaterials translational · 2023Review
- Biomaterials for Interbody Fusion in Bone Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Advances in surface modification of tantalum and porous tantalum for rapid osseointegration: A thematic review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- A novel circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network reveals hsa-circ-0040039 as a biomarker for intervertebral disc degeneration.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Article
- A novel rat model of interbody fusion based on anterior lumbar corpectomy and fusion (ALCF).BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Assessment of tantalum nanoparticle-induced MC3T3-E1 proliferation and underlying mechanisms.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2021Article
- Fabrication of Hydroxyapatite/Tantalum Composites by Pressureless Sintering in Different Atmosphere.ACS omega · 2021Article
- Tantalum: the next biomaterial in spine surgery?Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSome porous materials have been developed to enhance biologic fusion of the implants to bone in spine fusion surgeries. However, there are several inherent limitations. In this study, a novel biomedical porous tantalum was applied to in vitro and in vivo experiments to test its biocompatibility and osteocompatibility.
methodsBone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were cultured on porous tantalum implant. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Cell Counting Kit-8 assay were used to evaluate the cell toxicity and biocompatibility. Twenty-four rabbits were performed discectomy only (control group), discectomy with autologous bone implanted (autograft group), and discectomy with porous tantalum implanted (tantalum group) at 3 levels: L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-L6 in random order. All the 24 rabbits were randomly sacrificed at the different post-operative times (2, 4, 6, and 12 months; n = 6 at each time point). Histologic examination and micro-computed tomography scans were done to evaluate the fusion process. Comparison of fusion index scores between groups was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. Other comparisons of numerical variables between groups were made by Student t test.
resultsAll rabbits survived and recovered without any symptoms of nerve injury. Radiographic fusion index scores at 12 months post-operatively between autograft and tantalum groups showed no significant difference (2.89 ± 0.32 vs. 2.83 ± 0.38, F = 244.60, P = 0.709). Cell Counting Kit-8 assay showed no significant difference of absorbance values between the leaching liquor group and control group (1.25 ± 0.06 vs. 1.23 ± 0.04, t = -0.644, P = 0.545), which indicated the BMSC proliferation without toxicity. SEM images showed that these cells had irregular shapes with long spindles adhered to the surface of tantalum implant. No implant degradation, wear debris, or osteolysis was observed. Histologic results showed solid fusion in the porous tantalum and autologous bone implanted intervertebral spaces.
conclusionThis novel porous tantalum implant showed a good biocompatibility and osteocompatibility, which could be a valid biomaterial for interbody fusion cages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.