ArticleThe journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society2019
Selecting an Optimal Positive IHC Control for Verifying Antigen Retrieval.
Article in The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmented reality microscopy to bridge trust between AI and pathologists.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- DropBlot: single-cell western blotting of chemically fixed cancer cells.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Effects of Chemical Fixatives on Kinetic Measurements of Biomolecular Interaction on Cell Membrane.The Journal of membrane biology · 2024Article
- Validation of Linear Range HER2/Estrogen Receptor/Progesterone Receptor IHControls for Daily Quality Assurance.American journal of clinical pathology · 2023Article
- A Consortium for Analytic Standardization in Immunohistochemistry.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2022Review
- Development and Validation of Measurement Traceability for In Situ Immunoassays.Clinical chemistry · 2021Article
- A Root Cause Analysis Into the High Error Rate in Clinical Immunohistochemistry.Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Positive immunohistochemistry (IHC) controls are intended to detect problems in both immunostaining and heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER). However, it is not known what features in a control are important for verifying HIER. Contrary to expectation, the fact that a tissue is formalin-fixed does not necessarily render it suitable in verifying proper HIER. Some tissue controls, for some immunostains, strongly stain even without HIER. Consequently, the control may verify the immunostain but provide little or no information regarding the HIER step. To sort this out, we used formalin-fixed peptide epitopes, a model that provides for precise definition of analyte concentration, epitope composition, and degree of fixation. Our data demonstrate that formalin fixation generates a variable level of protein epitope masking, depending on the epitope recognized by the primary antibody. Some epitopes are highly masked while others hardly at all. Furthermore, the ability of amino acids in the epitope to react with formaldehyde can, at least in part, account for this variability. Most important, we demonstrate the importance of selecting a positive control with a low or intermediate analyte concentration (relative to the immunostain's analytic sensitivity). High analyte concentrations can be insensitive in verifying the HIER step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.