Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30628678›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2019

[Corrigendum] Inhibition of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell migration and invasion activity by andrographolide via suppression of nuclear factor-κB-dependent matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression.

Zanjing Zhai, Xinhua Qu, Haowei Li, Zhengxiao Ouyang, Wei Yan, Guangwang Liu, Xuqiang Liu, Qiming Fan, Tingting Tang, Kerong Dai and 1 more

Abstract readPublished Erratum
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zanjing ZhaiShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedics, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, P.R. China.
Xinhua QuShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedics, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, P.R. China.
Haowei LiShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedics, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, P.R. China.
Zhengxiao OuyangShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedics, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, P.R. China.
Wei YanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Wendeng Zhenggu Hospital of Shandong Province, Weihai, Shandong 264400, P.R. China.
Guangwang LiuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Central Hospital of Xuzhou, Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Southeast University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221009, P.R. China.
Xuqiang LiuShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedics, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, P.R. China.
Qiming FanShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedics, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, P.R. China.
Tingting TangShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedics, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, P.R. China.
Kerong DaiShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedics, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, P.R. China.
An QinShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedics, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subsequent to the publication of the above article, the authors have realized that Fig. 2 in their paper contained an error. The image selected to represent the experiment showing the migration of cells in the presence of andrographolide (30 μM) was chosen incorrectly during the figure compilation process. A corrected version of Fig. 2 is presented here. Note that this change does not affect the results or the conclusions reported in this paper, and all the authors agree to this correction. The authors apologize to the Editor and to the readership of the Journal for any inconvenience caused. [the original article was published in the Molecular Medicine Reports 11: 1139‑1145, 2015; DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2872].

Identifiers

PMID30628678
PMCPMC6390069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.