ReviewPharmacogenomics2019
Genetic variation of kinases and activation of nucleotide analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor tenofovir.
Review in Pharmacogenomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Viral target and metabolism-based rationale for combined use of recently authorized small molecule COVID-19 medicines: Molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir, and remdesivir.Fundamental & clinical pharmacology · 2023Review
- Viral dissemination and immune activation modulate antiretroviral drug levels in lymph nodes of SIV-infected rhesus macaques.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Effect of alcohol exposure on the efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, a major medicine against human immunodeficiency virus.Biochemical pharmacology · 2022Article
- Pharmacogenomics of Antiretroviral Drug Metabolism and Transport.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
As antiretroviral therapy has become more accessible across the world and coformulations have improved patient compliance; the morbidity and mortality of HIV/AIDS has decreased. However, there is still a substantial gap in knowledge regarding the impact of genetic variation on the metabolism of and response to some of the most commonly prescribed antiretrovirals, including the nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor tenofovir. While it has been scientifically established that tenofovir must be activated to be efficacious against HIV, the enzymes responsible for this activation have not been well characterized. The purpose of this review is to summarize and clarify the scientific knowledge regarding the enzymes that phosphorylate and activate this clinically important drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.