Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30628522›Full record

ArticleProsthetics and orthotics international2019

Adjustable sockets may improve residual limb fluid volume retention in transtibial prosthesis users.

Jacob T Brzostowski, Brian G Larsen, Robert T Youngblood, Marcia A Ciol, Brian J Hafner, Clement J Gurrey, Jake B McLean, Katheryn J Allyn, Joan E Sanders

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prosthetics and orthotics international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04494555 (Do Adaptable Sockets Improve Military Performance?), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04494555 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Do Adaptable Sockets Improve Military Performance?

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrooke Army Medical CenterRan2020 to 2024Enrolled15ConditionsAmputation StumpArmsStatic socket, User adjusted socket, Microprocessor-adjusting sockets
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Beyond step counts: Including wear time in prosthesis use assessment for lower-limb amputation.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacob T BrzostowskiUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brian G LarsenUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Robert T YoungbloodUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Marcia A CiolUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brian J HafnerUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Clement J GurreyUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jake B McLeanUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Katheryn J AllynUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joan E SandersUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Measuring In-Socket Residual Limb Volume FluctuationR01HD060585 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SANDERS, JOAN E. · 2009 to 2024
$6.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD060585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoss of residual limb volume degrades socket fit and may require accommodation.

objectivesTo examine if either of two accommodation strategies executed during resting, socket release with full socket size return and socket release with partial socket size return, enhanced limb fluid volume retention during subsequent activity. STUDY

designTwo repeated-measures experiments were conducted to assess the effects of socket release on limb fluid volume retention.

methodsLimb fluid volume was monitored while participants wore a socket with a single adjustable panel. Participants performed eight activity cycles that each included 10 min of sitting and 2 min of walking. The socket's posterior panel and pin lock were released during the fifth cycle while participants were sitting. In one experiment (Full Return), the socket was returned to its pre-release size; in a second experiment (Partial Return), it was returned to 102% of its pre-release size. Short-term and long-term limb fluid volume retention were calculated and compared to a projected, No Intervention condition.

resultsPartial Return and Full Return short-term retentions and Partial Return long-term retention were greater than those projected under the control condition ( p < 0.05).

conclusionSocket release during resting after activity, particularly when the socket is returned to a slightly larger size, may be an effective accommodation strategy to reduce fluid volume loss in transtibial prosthesis users. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study suggests that existing prosthetic technologies' adjustable sockets and locking pin tethers can be used in novel ways to help maintain residual limb fluid volume in active prosthesis users.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsProsthesis DesignProsthesis FittingAdultAgedAmputation StumpsElectric ImpedanceExtracellular FluidFemaleFluid ShiftsHumansMaleMiddle AgedTibiaadjustable socket and fluid volumeamputeebiomechanicsBiomechanics of prosthetic/orthotic devicesorthotic componentsprosthetic designprosthetic interface mechanicsprostheticstesting of prosthetic

Identifiers

PMID30628522
PMCPMC7447526
OpenAlexW2908924363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.