Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30628125›Full record

SynthesisJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2019

Interventions for sleep difficulties in adults with an intellectual disability: a systematic review.

P J Shanahan, S Palod, K J Smith, C Fife-Schaw, N Mirza

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sleep Disorders in Adults with Down Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

P J ShanahanDepartment of Psychological Sciences, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7570-4649
S PalodNeurodevelopmental Services, Your Healthcare CIC, Surbiton, UK.
K J SmithDepartment of Psychological Sciences, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
C Fife-SchawDepartment of Psychological Sciences, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
N MirzaSutton and Merton Mental Health Intellectual Disability Team, Jubilee Health Centre, Wallington, UK.
University of Surrey · GBNeuroDevelopment Center · USSutton Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent literature highlights higher prevalence rates of sleep difficulties amongst adults with an intellectual disability. However, no synthesis has been conducted to assess the effectiveness of existing interventions in this population. Thus, the aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of sleep interventions in adults with an intellectual disability (ID).

methodEight databases were searched to identify interventions for sleep difficulties amongst adults with an ID. The study quality was assessed with the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions. Nine studies (n = 97) were eligible for inclusion in the review.

resultsThere was a notable study on heterogeneity in terms of the population, study design, intervention studied, sleep assessment and outcome assessments used. Eight of the nine studies reported improvement in sleep following intervention. However, these findings need additional support as only 97 participants involving a variety of interventions and measurement systems were used across all studies. Furthermore, eight of the nine studies had serious to critical risk of bias. The only study identified as having low risk of bias was a placebo-controlled randomised controlled trial for the use of melatonin.

conclusionsThis review highlights the need for objective measures such as actigraphy and studies with greater experimental control investigating sleep interventions in adults with ID.

Indexed as

Intellectual DisabilityAdultComorbidityHumansSleep Wake Disordersadultinsomniaintellectual disabilitysleeptreatment

Identifiers

PMID30628125
PMCPMC6850627
OpenAlexW2909252202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.