Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30627699›Full record

ReviewEpigenetics insights2018

Impact of Metabolic Pathways and Epigenetics on Neural Stem Cells.

Mohamad-Ali Fawal, Alice Davy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epigenetics insights, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Effects of dopamine receptor antagonists and radiation on mouse neural stem/progenitor cells.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Lipid Mediated Regulation of Adult Stem Cell Behavior.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohamad-Ali FawalCentre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI) and Centre de Biologie du Développement (CBD), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Alice DavyCentre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI) and Centre de Biologie du Développement (CBD), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Balancing self-renewal with differentiation is crucial for neural stem cells (NSC) functions to ensure tissue development and homeostasis. Over the last years, multiple studies have highlighted the coupling of either metabolic or epigenetic reprogramming to NSC fate decisions. Metabolites are essential as they provide the energy and building blocks for proper cell function. Moreover, metabolites can also function as substrates and/or cofactors for epigenetic modifiers. It is becoming more evident that metabolic alterations and epigenetics rewiring are highly intertwined; however, their relation regarding determining NSC fate is not well understood. In this review, we summarize the major metabolic pathways and epigenetic modifications that play a role in NSC. We then focus on the notion that nutrients availability can function as a switch to modify the epigenetic machinery and drive NSC sequential differentiation during embryonic neurogenesis.

Indexed as

cerebrospinal fluidsepigeneticsglutamineglycolysislipid metabolismneural stem cellsNeurogenesisnutrientsone carbon folate pathway

Identifiers

PMID30627699
PMCPMC6311566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.