ArticleeNeuro
Motion Discrimination and the Motion Aftereffect in Mouse Vision.
Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reward history guides focal attention in whisker somatosensory cortex.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Cross-Frequency Couplings Reveal Mice Visual Cortex Selectivity to Grating Orientations.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Reward history guides focal attention in whisker somatosensory cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A consistent map in the medial entorhinal cortex supports spatial memory.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A consistent map in the medial entorhinal cortex supports spatial memory.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Walking humans and running mice: perception and neural encoding of optic flow during self-motion.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Rats spontaneously perceive global motion direction of drifting plaids.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Mice Discriminate Stereoscopic Surfaces Without Fixating in Depth.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Indicators and Criteria of Consciousness in Animals and Intelligent Machines: An Inside-Out Approach.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Prolonged exposure to motion in one direction often leads to the illusion of motion in the opposite direction for stationary objects. This motion aftereffect likely arises across several visual areas from adaptive changes in the balance of activity and competitive interactions. We examined whether or not the mouse was susceptible to this same illusion to determine whether it would be a suitable model for learning about the neural representation of the motion aftereffect. Under a classical conditioning paradigm, mice learned to lick when presented with motion in one direction and not the opposite direction. When the mice were adapted to motion preceding this test, their lick behavior for zero coherence motion was biased for motion in the opposite direction of the adapting stimulus. Overall, lick count versus motion coherence shifted in the opposite direction of the adapting stimulus. This suggests that although the mouse has a simpler visual system compared with primates, it still is subject to the motion aftereffect and may elucidate the underlying circuitry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.