Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30627631›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Neural Evidence of Hierarchical Cognitive Control during Haptic Processing: An fMRI Study.

Ane Gurtubay-Antolin, Patricia León-Cabrera, Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Brain mechanisms for processing caress-like touch in skin-picking disorder.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Human Somatosensory Processing and Artificial Somatosensation.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ane Gurtubay-AntolinCognition and Brain Plasticity Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona 08097, Spain.
Patricia León-CabreraCognition and Brain Plasticity Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona 08097, Spain.
Antoni Rodríguez-FornellsCognition and Brain Plasticity Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona 08097, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3249-6931

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interacting with our immediate surroundings requires constant manipulation of objects. Dexterous manipulation depends on comparison between actual and predicted sensory input, with these predictions calculated by means of lower- and higher-order corollary discharge signals. However, there is still scarce knowledge about the hierarchy in the neural architecture supporting haptic monitoring during manipulation. The present study aimed to assess this issue focusing on the cross talk between lower-order sensory and higher-order associative regions. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging in humans during a haptic discrimination task in which participants had to judge whether a touched shape or texture corresponded to an expected stimulus whose name was previously presented. Specialized haptic regions identified with an independent localizer task did not differ between expected and unexpected conditions, suggesting their lack of involvement in tactile monitoring. When presented stimuli did not match previous expectations, the left supramarginal gyrus (SMG), middle temporal, and medial prefrontal cortices were activated regardless of the nature of the haptic mismatch (shape/texture). The left primary somatosensory area (SI) responded differently to unexpected shapes and textures in line with a specialized detection of haptic mismatch. Importantly, connectivity analyses revealed that the left SMG and SI were more functionally coupled during unexpected trials, emphasizing their interaction. The results point for the first time to a hierarchical organization in the neural substrates underlying haptic monitoring during manipulation with the SMG as a higher-order hub comparing actual and predicted somatosensory input, and SI as a lower-order site involved in the detection of more specialized haptic mismatch.

Indexed as

Brain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrainCognitionDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleOxygenPhysical StimulationPsychophysicsTouchTouch PerceptionYoung AdultOxygencognitive controlhapticmanipulationSIsomatosensory predictionssupramarginal gyrus

Identifiers

PMID30627631
PMCPMC6325533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.