Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30627581›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2018

Ten Years of 2D Longitudinal Strain for Early Myocardial Dysfunction Detection: A Clinical Overview.

Concetta Zito, Luca Longobardo, Rodolfo Citro, Maurizio Galderisi, Lilia Oreto, Maria Ludovica Carerj, Roberta Manganaro, Maurizio Cusmà-Piccione, Maria Chiara Todaro, Gianluca Di Bella and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Concetta ZitoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Luca LongobardoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Rodolfo CitroDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, San Giovanni di Dio, Salerno, Italy.
Maurizio GalderisiDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Lilia OretoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Maria Ludovica CarerjDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Roberta ManganaroDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Maurizio Cusmà-PiccioneDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Maria Chiara TodaroDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Gianluca Di BellaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Egidio ImbalzanoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Internal Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Bijoy K KhandheriaAurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke's Medical Centers, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Marcus Family Fund for Echocardiography (ECHO) Research and Education, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7931-0858
Scipione CarerjDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the role of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) as the gold standard parameter for the evaluation of systolic function has been questioned, and many efforts have been concentrated in the clinical validation of new noninvasive tools for the study of myocardial contractility. Improvement in the accuracy of speckle-tracking echocardiography has resulted in a large amount of research showing the ability of two-dimensional strain to overcome EF limitations in the majority of primary and secondary heart diseases. Currently, global longitudinal strain (GLS) is considered the most accurate and sensitive parameter for the assessment of early left ventricular dysfunction. This review summarizes the advantages that this measurement can provide in several clinical settings. Moreover, the important cautions that should be considered in making the choice to use GLS also are addressed. Finally, a special focus on bull's-eye polar maps for the assessment of regional changes of longitudinal function and the usefulness of these maps in the differential diagnosis of several diseases is provided.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyMyocardial ContractionStroke VolumeVentricular Dysfunction, LeftHumans

Identifiers

PMID30627581
PMCPMC6304576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.