ArticlePeerJ2019
Comparison of non-magnetic and magnetic beads multiplex assay for assessment of
Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Development Potential of AuNPs-Based Lateral Flow Technology Combined with Other Advanced Technologies in POCT.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Diagnostic applications of microsphere-based flow cytometry: A review.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Multiplex Serology for Measurement of IgG Antibodies Against Eleven Infectious Diseases in a National Serosurvey: Haiti 2014-2015.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Assessment of IgG3 as a serological exposure marker forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- An Enhanced Lateral Flow Assay Based on Aptamer-Magnetic Separation and Multifold AuNPs for Ultrasensitive Detection ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Expression of in vivo biotinylated recombinant antigens SAG1 and SAG2A from Toxoplasma gondii for improved seroepidemiological bead-based multiplex assays.BMC biotechnology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNew reagents have emerged allowing researchers to assess a growing number of vaccine-associated immune parameters. Multiplex immunoassay(s) are emerging as efficient high-throughput assays in malaria serology. Currently, commercial vendors market several bead reagents for cytometric bead assays (CBA) but relative performances are not well published. We have compared two types of bead-based multiplex assays to measure relative antibody levels to malarial antigens.
methodsAssays for the measurement of antibodies to five
resultsDISCUSSION: Magnetic and non-magnetic beads performed similarly in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.