Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30627437›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical

Contactin-1 and contactin-2 in cerebrospinal fluid as potential biomarkers for axonal domain dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.

Madhurima Chatterjee, Marleen Ja Koel-Simmelink, Inge Mw Verberk, Joep Killestein, Hugo Vrenken, Christian Enzinger, Stefan Ropele, Franz Fazekas, Michael Khalil, Charlotte E Teunissen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Neuroaxonal and Glial Markers in Patients of the Same Age With Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Madhurima ChatterjeeNeurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1647-3307
Marleen Ja Koel-SimmelinkNeurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.
Inge Mw VerberkNeurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.
Joep KillesteinDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.
Hugo VrenkenDepartment of Radiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.
Christian EnzingerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Stefan RopeleDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Franz FazekasDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Michael KhalilDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5350-3328
Charlotte E TeunissenNeurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLMedical University of Graz · ATAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContactin-1 and contactin-2 are important for the maintenance of axonal integrity.

objectiveTo investigate the cerebrospinal fluid levels of contactin-1 and contactin-2 in multiple sclerosis patients and controls, and their potential use as prognostic markers for neurodegeneration.

methodsCerebrospinal fluid contactin-1 and contactin-2 were measured in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (

resultsContactin-1 and contactin-2 levels were up to 1.4-fold reduced in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (contactin-1:

conclusionCerebrospinal fluid contactin-1 and contactin-2 reveal axonal dysfunction in various stages of multiple sclerosis and their inclusion to the biomarker panel may provide better insight into the extent of axonal damage/dysfunction.

Indexed as

axonal damageContactinCSF biomarkermultiple sclerosisneurofilament

Identifiers

PMID30627437
PMCPMC6305953
OpenAlexW2906456050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.