ArticleMalawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi2018
Acceptability of couple antenatal education: A qualitative study of expectant couples attending antenatal clinics in Blantyre, Malawi.
Article in Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inequalities and Determinants of Quality Antenatal Care Coverage Among Women of Reproductive Age (15-49) in Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of National Data.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Antenatal couples' counselling in Uganda (ACCU): study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2022Article
- Father's participation in prenatal care and childbirth: contributions of nurses' interventions.Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Few studies have assessed the effectiveness and acceptability of male partner involvement in antenatal education. Yet, male involvement in antenatal care including antenatal education has been proposed as a strategy to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. We conducted this study to add to the body of knowledge on acceptability of male partner involvement in antenatal education following an intervention. Methods: This was a cross sectional qualitative study using 18 in-depth interviews with 10 couples, 5 women from the couples group and 3 nurse-midwife technicians. Participants were purposively selected and interviewed between July and November, 2017. The study setting was South Lunzu and Mpemba Health Centres and their catchment areas. All interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and translated from Chichewa into English. Data were coded in Nvivo 10.0 and analyzed thematically. Findings: We identified three themes: benefit of content received; organization of couple antenatal education appropriate for male partner involvement; and delivery of couple antenatal education incentive for male involvement and learning. However, some improvements were suggested regarding content, organization and delivery of the education sessions. Conclusion: Couple antenatal education was acceptable to the couples and the facilitators in terms of content received, organization and delivery. Nevertheless, adding naming the baby to the list of topics, creating a special day for couples to attend antenatal education and providing a readable leaflet are likely to make couple antenatal education more user friendly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.