ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2019
Effects of Sitagliptin on Pancreatic Beta-Cells in Type 2 Diabetes With Sulfonylurea Treatment: A Prospective Randomized Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sitagliptin, Metformin and Glimepiride Fixed-Dose Combination Compared to Co-Administration of Metformin and High-Dose Glimepiride in Indian Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Phase 3 Clinical Study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Glimepiride, Voglibose, and Metformin ER in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Active-Controlled Study.Journal of diabetes · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis prospective randomized, multicenter, open-label, comparative study was performed to analyze the effects of sitagliptin on glycemic control and maintenance of beta-cell function in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes treated with low-dose glimepiride.
methodsForty-one patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with low-dose glimepiride (≤ 2 mg/day) were prospectively enrolled in this study (age: 20 - 75 years; hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): 7.4- 9.4%). The patients were randomized into two groups: the glimepiride (G) group, in which glimepiride dose was increased gradually to 6 mg/day, and the sitagliptin (S) group, in which sitagliptin was added at a dose of 50 mg/day.
resultsHbA1c level was significantly decreased after 24 weeks, but not 12 weeks, in the G group, while a significant decrease was seen after 12 weeks in the S group. Although there were no significant differences in HbA1c level at 24 weeks between the two groups (P = 0.057). The overall trend of changes in HbA1c level suggested that the glucose-lowering effects were superior in the S group. Furthermore, a significant change in fasting glucose was seen in the S group, but not in the G group. Glycemic control target was achieved in 36.7% and 16.7% patients in the S group and the G group, respectively. The proinsulin/insulin (P/I) ratio was significantly increased in the G group, whereas it tended to decrease in the S group. After 24 weeks of treatment, no significant difference was observed in the P/I ratio between the two groups, whereas a significant difference was noted in the ΔP/I (amount of change). Albuminuria tended to increase in the G group compared with the S group.
conclusionThe results of the present study suggested that sitagliptin effectively lowered hyperglycemia and that it may have a protective effect on pancreatic beta-cells when combined with a low dose of glimepiride. Therefore, sitagliptin may represent a useful combination therapy with low-dose sulfonylurea, not only for achieving glycemic control but also for protection of pancreatic beta-cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.