Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30626928›Full record

ArticleNature plants2019

Stout camphor tree genome fills gaps in understanding of flowering plant genome evolution.

Shu-Miaw Chaw, Yu-Ching Liu, Yu-Wei Wu, Han-Yu Wang, Chan-Yi Ivy Lin, Chung-Shien Wu, Huei-Mien Ke, Lo-Yu Chang, Chih-Yao Hsu, Hui-Ting Yang and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature plants, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
36.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. High-qualityHorticulture research · 2025
    Article
  13. Characteristics and Expression Profiles of IdentifiedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Shu-Miaw Chaw *Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. smchaw@sinica.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2499-7071
Yu-Ching LiuBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Wei WuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Han-Yu WangBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chan-Yi Ivy LinBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chung-Shien WuBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Huei-Mien KeBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lo-Yu ChangBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Yao HsuBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hui-Ting YangBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Edi SudiantoBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0771-0385
Min-Hung HsuBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kun-Pin WuInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ling-Ni WangBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
James H Leebens-MackPlant Biology Department, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Isheng J Tsai *Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. ijtsai@sinica.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2123-5058
Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWNational Taiwan University · TWTaipei Medical University · TWUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present reference-quality genome assembly and annotation for the stout camphor tree (Cinnamomum kanehirae (Laurales, Lauraceae)), the first sequenced member of the Magnoliidae comprising four orders (Laurales, Magnoliales, Canellales and Piperales) and over 9,000 species. Phylogenomic analysis of 13 representative seed plant genomes indicates that magnoliid and eudicot lineages share more recent common ancestry than monocots. Two whole-genome duplication events were inferred within the magnoliid lineage: one before divergence of Laurales and Magnoliales and the other within the Lauraceae. Small-scale segmental duplications and tandem duplications also contributed to innovation in the evolutionary history of Cinnamomum. For example, expansion of the terpenoid synthase gene subfamilies within the Laurales spawned the diversity of Cinnamomum monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, PlantPhylogenyAlkyl and Aryl TransferasesCinnamomum camphoraDNA Transposable ElementsMagnoliopsidaMolecular Sequence AnnotationMultigene FamilyPlant ProteinsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSyntenyAlkyl and Aryl TransferasesDNA Transposable ElementsPlant Proteinsterpene synthase

Identifiers

PMID30626928
PMCPMC6784883
OpenAlexW2910743782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.