Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30626911›Full record

Trial reportMolecular psychiatry2020

A phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of NSI-189 phosphate, a neurogenic compound, among outpatients with major depressive disorder.

G I Papakostas, K Johe, H Hand, A Drouillard, P Russo, G Kay, R Kashambwa, B Hoeppner, M Flynn, A Yeung and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How should we design future mechanistic and/or efficacy clinical trials?Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

G I PapakostasMassachusetts General Hospital Clinical Trials Network and Institute (MGH CTNI), Boston, MA, USA. gpapakostas@partners.org.
K JoheNeuralstem, Inc, Germantown, MD, USA.
H HandNeuralstem, Inc, Germantown, MD, USA.
A DrouillardNeuralstem, Inc, Germantown, MD, USA.
P RussoNeuralstem, Inc, Germantown, MD, USA.
G KayCognitive Research Corp., Saint Petersburg, Florida, USA.
R KashambwaMassachusetts General Hospital Clinical Trials Network and Institute (MGH CTNI), Boston, MA, USA.
B HoeppnerMassachusetts General Hospital Clinical Trials Network and Institute (MGH CTNI), Boston, MA, USA.
M FlynnMassachusetts General Hospital Clinical Trials Network and Institute (MGH CTNI), Boston, MA, USA.
A YeungMassachusetts General Hospital Clinical Trials Network and Institute (MGH CTNI), Boston, MA, USA.
M A MartinsonMassachusetts General Hospital Clinical Trials Network and Institute (MGH CTNI), Boston, MA, USA.
M FavaMassachusetts General Hospital Clinical Trials Network and Institute (MGH CTNI), Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NSI-189 is a novel neurogenic compound independent of monoamine reuptake pathways. This trial evaluated oral NSI-189 as monotherapy in major depressive disorder. To improve signal detection, the sequential-parallel comparison design (SPCD) was chosen. Two hundred and twenty subjects were randomized to NSI-189 40 mg daily, 80 mg daily, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Montogmery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Secondary subject-rated measures included the Symptoms of Depression Questionnaire (SDQ), the Cognitive and Physical Functioning Scale (CPFQ), the patient-rated version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Scale (QIDS-SR), and subtests from the CogScreen and Cogstate cognitive tests. MADRS score reduction versus placebo did not reach significance for either dose (40 mg pooled mean difference -1.8, p = 0.22, 80 mg pooled mean difference -1.4, p = 0.34, respectively). However, the 40 mg dose showed greater overall reduction in SDQ (pooled mean difference -8.2; Cohen's d for Stages 1 and 2 = -0.11 and -0.64, p = 0.04), and CPFQ scores (pooled mean difference -1.9; Cohen's d for Stages 1 and 2 = -0.28 and -0.47, p = 0.03) versus placebo, as well as QIDS-SR scores in Stage 2 of SPCD (-2.5; Cohen's d Stages 1 and 2 = -0.03 and -0.68, p = 0.04). The 40 mg dose also showed advantages on some objective cognitive measures of the CogScreen (absolute Cohen's d ranged between 0.12 and 1.12 in favor of NSI-189, p values between 0.002 and 0.048 for those with overall significance), but not the Cogstate test. Both doses were well tolerated. These findings replicate those of phase 1b study, and warrant further exploration of the antidepressant and pro-cognitive effects of NSI-189.

Indexed as

AminopyridinesCognitionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsPiperazinesTreatment OutcomeAminopyridinesNSI-189Piperazines

Identifiers

PMID30626911
PMCPMC7303010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.