Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30626904›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Whole rumen metagenome sequencing allows classifying and predicting feed efficiency and intake levels in cattle.

Beatriz Delgado, Alex Bach, Isabel Guasch, Carmen González, Guillermo Elcoso, Jennie E Pryce, Oscar Gonzalez-Recio

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Beatriz DelgadoEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas. UPM. Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7653-6632
Alex BachInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançants, ICREA, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6804-2002
Isabel GuaschBlanca from the Pyrenees, Hostalets the Tost, 25795, Lleida, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4277-5237
Carmen GonzálezDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria O.A., M.P, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Guillermo ElcosoBlanca from the Pyrenees, Hostalets the Tost, 25795, Lleida, Spain.
Jennie E PryceBioscience Research Division, ECODEV, Bundoora, 3038, Australia.
Oscar Gonzalez-RecioEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas. UPM. Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain. gonzalez.oscar@inia.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9106-4063

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current research was carried out to determine the associations between the rumen microbiota and traits related with feed efficiency in a Holstein cattle population (n = 30) using whole metagenome sequencing. Improving feed efficiency (FE) is important for a more sustainable livestock production. The variability for the efficiency of feed utilization in ruminants is partially controlled by the gastrointestinal microbiota. Modulating the microbiota composition can promote a more sustainable and efficient livestock. This study revealed that most efficient cows had larger relative abundance of Bacteroidetes (P = 0.041) and Prevotella (P = 0.003), while lower, but non-significant (P = 0.119), relative abundance of Firmicutes. Methanobacteria (P = 0.004) and Methanobrevibacter (P = 0.003) were also less abundant in the high-efficiency cows. A de novo metagenome assembly was carried out using de Bruijn graphs in MEGAHIT resulting in 496,375 contigs. An agnostic pre-selection of microbial contigs allowed high classification accuracy for FE and intake levels using hierarchical classification. These microbial contigs were also able to predict FE and intake levels with accuracy of 0.19 and 0.39, respectively, in an independent population (n = 31). Nonetheless, a larger potential accuracy up to 0.69 was foreseen in this study for datasets that allowed a larger statistical power. Enrichment analyses showed that genes within these contigs were mainly involved in fatty acids and cellulose degradation pathways. The findings indicated that there are differences between the microbiota compositions of high and low-efficiency animals both at the taxonomical and gene levels. These differences are even more evident in terms of intake levels. Some of these differences remain even between populations under different diets and environments, and can provide information on the feed utilization performance without information on the individual intake level.

Indexed as

Animal FeedGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacillotaCattleEuryarchaeotaMetagenomeMethanobrevibacterPrevotellaRumen

Identifiers

PMID30626904
PMCPMC6327033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.