ReviewGenetics2019
Selective Sweeps.
Review in Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
117 citing papers in PubMed.
- Local Trade-Offs Shape Flower Size Evolution Across Arabidopsis thaliana Distribution.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Article
- Popformer: Learning general signatures of positive selection with a self-supervised transformer.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Whole-Genome Resequencing Reveals Deep Genomic Differentiation and Highly Differentiated Segments Between a Composite Domestic Cattle Population and Yak from the Ili River Valley and Other Xinjiang Regions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Effects of Different SNP Calling and Sequence Mapping Choices on the Inference of Genetic Architecture Underlying Migration Tendency.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Inferring Patterns of Purifying, Positive, and Balancing Selection in the Coppery Titi Monkey (Plecturocebus cupreus) Utilizing a Well-Fit Evolutionary Baseline Model.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Identifying Adaptive Footprints in the Presence of Demographic Uncertainty.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- A Beginner's How-To Guide to Urban Population Genetics and Genomics.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Detecting Positive Selection by Modeling Structure Within Images of Genetic Variation.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genomic Signatures of Microgeographic Adaptation in Anopheles coluzzii Across Urban, Rural, and Forested Environments in Gabon.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Popformer: Learning general signatures of positive selection with a self-supervised transformer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Cryptic phenotypic variation emerges rapidly during the adaptive evolution of a carbapenemase.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study of Gross Hair Weight and Hair Length Traits in Different Body Regions of Tianzhu White Yak.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- The performance of genetic-constraint metrics varies significantly across the human noncoding genome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Repeated adaptation in sperm-related and neuronal genes in brood parasitic birds.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Major changes in gene expression between strains of diapausing and non-diapause spruce budworm.PloS one · 2026Article
- Towards an evolutionary baseline model ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For almost 20 years, many inference methods have been developed to detect selective sweeps and localize the targets of directional selection in the genome. These methods are based on population genetic models that describe the effect of a beneficial allele (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.